Compression of Structured Data with Autoencoders: Provable Benefit of Nonlinearities and Depth
Kevin Kögler, Aleksandr Shevchenko, Hamed Hassani, Marco Mondelli
Abstract
Autoencoders are a prominent model in many empirical branches of machine learning and lossy data compression. However, basic theoretical questions remain unanswered even in a shallow two-layer setting. In particular, to what degree does a shallow autoencoder capture the structure of the underlying data distribution? For the prototypical case of the 1-bit compression of sparse Gaussian data, we prove that gradient descent converges to a solution that completely disregards the sparse structure of the input. Namely, the performance of the algorithm is the same as if it was compressing a Gaussian source - with no sparsity. For general data distributions, we give evidence of a phase transition phenomenon in the shape of the gradient descent minimizer, as a function of the data sparsity: below the critical sparsity level, the minimizer is a rotation taken uniformly at random (just like in the compression of non-sparse data); above the critical sparsity, the minimizer is the identity (up to a permutation). Finally, by exploiting a connection with approximate message passing algorithms, we show how to improve upon Gaussian performance for the compression of sparse data: adding a denoising function to a shallow architecture already reduces the loss provably, and a suitable multi-layer decoder leads to a further improvement. We validate our findings on image datasets, such as CIFAR-10 and MNIST.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 561b04cd-6882-488a-ac82-c32dd0484eafCited by top-tier papers2
- A theory of learning data statistics in diffusion models, from easy to hardLorenzo Bardone, Claudia Merger, Sebastian GoldtICML 2026
- On the Feature Learning in Diffusion ModelsAndi Han, Wei Huang, Yuan Cao, Difan ZouICLR 2025
Builds on4
- The staircase property: How hierarchical structure can guide deep learningEmmanuel Abbe, Enric Boix-Adserà, Matthew S. Brennan, Guy Bresler et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 74 citations
- Transformers learn through gradual rank increaseEmmanuel Abbe, Samy Bengio, Enric Boix-Adserà, Etai Littwin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 60 citations
- Regularized linear autoencoders recover the principal components, eventuallyXuchan Bao, James Lucas, Sushant Sachdeva, Roger B. GrosseNeurIPS 2020 · 40 citations
- High-dimensional Asymptotics of Denoising AutoencodersHugo Cui, Lenka ZdeborováNeurIPS 2023 · 26 citations
Related papers
- Fundamental Limits of Two-layer Autoencoders, and Achieving Them with Gradient MethodsAleksandr Shevchenko, Kevin Kögler, Hamed Hassani, Marco MondelliICML 2023 · 3 citations
- Unrolled denoising networks provably learn to perform optimal Bayesian inferenceAayush Karan, Kulin Shah, Sitan Chen, Yonina C. EldarNeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
- All-or-nothing statistical and computational phase transitions in sparse spiked matrix estimationJean Barbier, Nicolas Macris, Cynthia RushNeurIPS 2020 · 42 citations
- Sample Complexity Bounds for 1-bit Compressive Sensing and Binary Stable Embeddings with Generative PriorsZhaoqiang Liu, Selwyn Gomes, Avtansh Tiwari, Jonathan ScarlettICML 2020 · 30 citations
- Robust One-Bit Recovery via ReLU Generative Networks: Near-Optimal Statistical Rate and Global Landscape AnalysisShuang Qiu, Xiaohan Wei, Zhuoran YangICML 2020 · 18 citations
