RAIFLE: Reconstruction Attacks on Interaction-based Federated Learning with Adversarial Data Manipulation
Dzung Pham, Shreyas Kulkarni, Amir Houmansadr
Abstract
Federated learning has emerged as a promising privacy-preserving solution for machine learning domains that rely on user interactions, particularly recommender systems and online learning to rank. While there has been substantial research on the privacy of traditional federated learning, little attention has been paid to the privacy properties of these interaction-based settings. In this work, we show that users face an elevated risk of having their private interactions reconstructed by the central server when the server can control the training features of the items that users interact with. We introduce RAIFLE, a novel optimization-based attack framework where the server actively manipulates the features of the items presented to users to increase the success rate of reconstruction. Our experiments with federated recommendation and online learning-to-rank scenarios demonstrate that RAIFLE is significantly more powerful than existing reconstruction attacks like gradient inversion, achieving high performance consistently in most settings. We discuss the pros and cons of several possible countermeasures to defend against RAIFLE in the context of interaction-based federated learning. Our code is open-sourced at https://github.com/dzungvpham/raifle.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c9387a80-56c9-481f-a1da-e1ce19ed1d0eBuilds on15
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2023 · 2,230 citations
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
Related papers
- FedRecAttack: Model Poisoning Attack to Federated RecommendationDazhong Rong, Shuai Ye, Ruoyan Zhao, Hon Ning Yuen et al.ICDE 2022 · 76 citations
- Manipulating Federated Recommender Systems: Poisoning with Synthetic Users and Its CountermeasuresWei Yuan, Quoc Viet Hung Nguyen, Tieke He, Liang Chen et al.SIGIR 2023 · 46 citations
- Fast Generation-Based Gradient Leakage Attacks against Highly Compressed GradientsDongyun Xue, Haomiao Yang, Mengyu Ge, Jingwei Li et al.INFOCOM 2023 · 4 citations
- Soteria: Provable Defense Against Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning From Representation PerspectiveJingwei Sun, Ang Li, Binghui Wang, Huanrui Yang et al.CVPR 2021
- Preventing the Popular Item Embedding Based Attack in Federated RecommendationsJun Zhang, Huan Li, Dazhong Rong, Yan Zhao et al.ICDE 2024 · 7 citations
