Preventing the Popular Item Embedding Based Attack in Federated Recommendations
Jun Zhang, Huan Li, Dazhong Rong, Yan Zhao, Ke Chen, Lidan Shou
Abstract
Privacy concerns have led to the rise of federated recommender systems (FRS), which can create personalized models across distributed clients. However, FRS is vulnerable to poisoning attacks, where malicious users manipulate gradients to promote their target items intentionally. Existing attacks against FRS have limitations, as they depend on specific models and prior knowledge, restricting their real-world applicability. In our exploration of practical FRS vulnerabilities, we devise a model-agnostic and prior-knowledge-free attack, named PIECK (Popular Item Embedding based Attack). The core module of PIECK is popular item mining, which leverages embedding changes during FRS training to effectively identify the popular items. Built upon the core module, PIECK branches into two diverse solutions: The PIECKIPE solution employs an item popularity enhancement module, which aligns the embeddings of targeted items with the mined popular items to increase item exposure. The PIECKUEA further enhances the robustness of the attack by using a user embedding approximation module, which approximates private user embeddings using mined popular items. Upon identifying PIECK, we evaluate existing federated defense methods and find them ineffective against PIECK, as poisonous gradients inevitably overwhelm the cold target items. We then propose a novel defense method by introducing two regularization terms during user training, which constrain item popularity enhancement and user embedding approximation while preserving FRS performance. We evaluate PIECK and its defense across two base models, three real datasets, four top-tier attacks, and six general defense methods, affirming the efficacy of both PIECK and its defense.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cfd389f9-b609-40a9-8da8-4ccda1ab0ca5Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for RecommendationXiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li et al.SIGIR 2020 · 4,448 citations
- FedFast: Going Beyond Average for Faster Training of Federated Recommender SystemsKhalil Muhammad, Qinqin Wang, Diarmuid O'Reilly-Morgan, Elias Z. Tragos et al.KDD 2020 · 215 citations
- FedRec++: Lossless Federated Recommendation with Explicit FeedbackFeng Liang, Weike Pan, Zhong MingAAAI 2021 · 152 citations
- A Model of Two Tales: Dual Transfer Learning Framework for Improved Long-tail Item RecommendationYin Zhang, Derek Zhiyuan Cheng, Tiansheng Yao, Xinyang Yi et al.WWW 2021 · 124 citations
- Hierarchical Personalized Federated Learning for User ModelingJinze Wu, Qi Liu, Zhenya Huang, Yuting Ning et al.WWW 2021 · 97 citations
Related papers
- Manipulating Federated Recommender Systems: Poisoning with Synthetic Users and Its CountermeasuresWei Yuan, Quoc Viet Hung Nguyen, Tieke He, Liang Chen et al.SIGIR 2023 · 46 citations
- Untargeted Attack against Federated Recommendation Systems via Poisonous Item Embeddings and the DefenseYang Yu, Qi Liu, Likang Wu, Runlong Yu et al.AAAI 2023 · 73 citations
- Poisoning Federated Recommender Systems with Fake UsersMing Yin, Yichang Xu, Minghong Fang, Neil Zhenqiang GongWWW 2024 · 32 citations
- Not One Less: Exploring Interplay between User Profiles and Items in Untargeted Attacks against Federated RecommendationYurong Hao, Xihui Chen, Xiaoting Lyu, Jiqiang Liu et al.CCS 2024 · 4 citations
- FedRecAttack: Model Poisoning Attack to Federated RecommendationDazhong Rong, Shuai Ye, Ruoyan Zhao, Hon Ning Yuen et al.ICDE 2022 · 76 citations
