Measuring and Guiding Monosemanticity
Ruben Härle, Felix Friedrich, Manuel Brack, Björn Deiseroth, Stephan Wäldchen, Patrick Schramowski, Kristian Kersting
Abstract
There is growing interest in leveraging mechanistic interpretability and controllability to better understand and influence the internal dynamics of large language models (LLMs). However, current methods face fundamental challenges in reliably localizing and manipulating feature representations. Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have recently emerged as a promising direction for feature extraction at scale, yet they, too, are limited by incomplete feature isolation and unreliable monosemanticity. To systematically quantify these limitations, we introduce Feature Monosemanticity Score (FMS), a novel metric to quantify feature monosemanticity in latent representation. Building on these insights, we propose Guided Sparse Autoencoders (G-SAE), a method that conditions latent representations on labeled concepts during training. We demonstrate that reliable localization and disentanglement of target concepts within the latent space improve interpretability, detection of behavior, and control. Specifically, our evaluations on toxicity detection, writing style identification, and privacy attribute recognition show that G-SAE not only enhances monosemanticity but also enables more effective and fine-grained steering with less quality degradation. Our findings provide actionable guidelines for measuring and advancing mechanistic interpretability and control of LLMs. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c86cebf5-3ef0-4c17-823a-45d33864210cCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on17
- StyleCLIP: Text-Driven Manipulation of StyleGAN ImageryOr Patashnik, Zongze Wu, Eli Shechtman, Daniel Cohen-Or et al.ICCV 2021 · 1,437 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- In-context Vectors: Making In Context Learning More Effective and Controllable Through Latent Space SteeringSheng Liu, Haotian Ye, Lei Xing, James Y. ZouICML 2024 · 244 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different FeaturesGonçalo Paulo, Nora BelroseICLR 2026 · 96 citations
- Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept GeometrySai Sumedh R. Hindupur, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Thomas Fel, Demba BaNeurIPS 2025 · 65 citations
Related papers
- Rethinking Evaluation of Sparse Autoencoders through the Representation of Polysemous WordsGouki Minegishi, Hiroki Furuta, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka MatsuoICLR 2025
- On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted RemedyJingyi Cui, Qi Zhang, Yifei Wang, Yisen WangICLR 2026 · 16 citations
- SAE-SSV: Supervised Steering in Sparse Representation Spaces for Reliable Control of Language ModelsZirui He, Mingyu Jin, Bo Shen, Ali Payani et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- ProtSAE: Disentangling and Interpreting Protein Language Models via Semantically-Guided Sparse AutoencodersXiangyu Liu, Haodi Lei, Yi Liu, Yang Liu et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Interpretable and Steerable Concept Bottleneck Sparse AutoencodersAkshay Kulkarni, Tsui-Wei Weng, Vivek Narayanaswamy, Shusen Liu et al.CVPR 2026 · 6 citations
