Clustering and Ranking: Diversity-preserved Instruction Selection through Expert-aligned Quality Estimation
Yuan Ge, Yilun Liu, Chi Hu, Weibin Meng, Shimin Tao, Xiaofeng Zhao, Mahong Xia, Zhang Li, Boxing Chen, Hao Yang, Bei Li, Tong Xiao, JingBo Zhu
Abstract
With contributions from the open-source community, a vast amount of instruction tuning (IT) data has emerged. Given the significant resource allocation required for training and evaluating models, it is advantageous to have an efficient method for selecting high-quality IT data. However, existing methods for instruction data selection have limitations such as relying on fragile external APIs, being affected by biases in GPT models, or reducing the diversity of the selected instruction dataset. In this paper, we propose an industrial-friendly, expert-aligned and diversity-preserved instruction data selection method: Clustering and Ranking (CaR). CaR employs a two-step process: first, it ranks instruction pairs using a high-accuracy (84.25%) scoring model aligned with expert preferences; second, it preserves dataset diversity through clustering. In our experiment, CaR efficiently selected a mere 1.96% of Alpaca's IT data, yet the resulting Al-paCaR model surpassed Alpaca's performance by an average of 32.1% in GPT-4 evaluations. Moreover, we find that data selecting is a consistent paradigm whether the pre-trained model is more capable or the model parameters scaling up. Our approach employs compact models with 550M parameters and incurs just 11.2% of the financial outlay of current methods, enhancing its industrial deployability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c707baf5-76bd-4b31-a15a-b0e4beed1c98Cited by top-tier papers14
- Hierarchical Fine-grained Preference Optimization for Physically Plausible Video GenerationHarold Haodong Chen, Haojian Huang, Qifeng Chen, Harry Yang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 25 citations
- DreamPRM: Domain-reweighted Process Reward Model for Multimodal ReasoningQi Cao, Ruiyi Wang, Ruiyi Zhang, Sai Ashish Somayajula et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- Measuring Data Diversity for Instruction Tuning: A Systematic Analysis and A Reliable MetricYuming Yang, Yang Nan, Junjie Ye, Shihan Dou et al.ACL 2025 · 15 citations
- Aligning Large Language Models to Follow Instructions and Hallucinate Less via Effective Data FilteringShuzheng Si, Haozhe Zhao, Gang Chen, Cheng Gao et al.ACL 2025 · 11 citations
- CoIDO: Efficient Data Selection for Visual Instruction Tuning via Coupled Importance-Diversity OptimizationYichen Yan, Ming Zhong, Qi Zhu, Xiaoling Gu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
Builds on11
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human PreferenceWei-Lin Chiang, Lianmin Zheng, Ying Sheng, Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos et al.ICML 2024 · 1,212 citations
- AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human FeedbackYann Dubois, Chen Xuechen Li, Rohan Taori, Tianyi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 948 citations
- LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction TuningMengzhou Xia, Sadhika Malladi, Suchin Gururangan, Sanjeev Arora et al.ICML 2024 · 460 citations
Related papers
- SelectIT: Selective Instruction Tuning for LLMs via Uncertainty-Aware Self-ReflectionLiangxin Liu, Xuebo Liu, Derek F. Wong, Dongfang Li et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 49 citations
- From Selection to Refinement: Iterative Optimization for Instruction DataHang Hu, Ziyan Liu, Rujie Wen, Ruihui Hou et al.ACL 2026
- Neuron-Aware Data Selection in Instruction Tuning for Large Language ModelsXin Chen, Junchao Wu, Shu Yang, Runzhe Zhan et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-TuningHao Zhao, Maksym Andriushchenko, Francesco Croce, Nicolas FlammarionICML 2024 · 96 citations
- Priority on High-Quality: Selecting Instruction Data via Consistency Verification of Noise InjectionHong Zhang, Feng Zhao, Ruilin Zhao, Cheng Yan et al.EMNLP 2025
