Did you mix me? Formally Verifying Verifiable Mix Nets in Electronic Voting
Thomas Haines, Rajeev Goré, Bhavesh Sharma
Abstract
Verifiable mix nets, and specifically, proofs of (correct) shuffle, are a fundamental building block in numerous applications: these zero-knowledge proofs allow the prover to produce a public transcript which can be perused by the verifier to confirm the purported shuffle. They are particularly vital to verifiable electronic voting, where they underpin almost all voting schemes with non-trivial tallying methods. These complicated pieces of cryptography are a prime location for critical errors which might allow undetected modification of the outcome. The best solution to preventing these errors is to machinecheck the cryptographic properties of the design and implementation of the mix net. Particularly crucial for the integrity of the outcome is the soundness of the design and implementation of the verifier (software). Unfortunately, several different encryption schemes are used in many different slight variations which makes it infeasible to machine-check every single case individually. However, a particular optimized variant of the Terelius-Wikström mix net is, and has been, widely deployed in elections including national elections in Norway, Estonia and Switzerland, albeit with many slight variations and several different encryption schemes. In this work, we develop the logical theory and formal methods tools to machine-check the design and implementation of all these variants of Terelius-Wikström mix nets, for all the different encryption schemes used; resulting in provably correct mix nets for all these different variations. We do this carefully to ensure that we can extract a formally verified implementation of the verifier (software) which is compatible with existing deployed implementations of the Terelius-Wikström mix net. This gives us provably correct implementations of the verifiers for more than half of the national elections which have used verifiable mix nets. Our implementation of a proof of correct shuffle is the first to be machine-checked to be cryptographically correct and able to verify proof transcripts from national elections. We demonstrate the practicality of our implementation by verifying transcripts produced by the Verificatum mix net system and the CHVote evoting system from Switzerland. 1 This assertion is based on personal correspondence with many of the leading experts who regularly examine e-voting schemes. 2 There are a few other verifiable mix nets that have been used in real government elections but they are significantly less common. 3 Formally we prove special soundness which is known to imply soundness. rich type system has certain advantages. For example, we are required to formally define the types of our functions inside Coq. If we run the functions, the inputs are checked with respect to the claimed type, which, as we shall see, has positive implications for privacy and integrity.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c7076906-75bf-4faf-a1ba-50c83bca6f4cCited by top-tier papers4
- Formalizing Soundness Proofs of Linear PCP SNARKsBolton Bailey, Andrew MillerUSENIX Security 2024 · 4 citations
- Shaken, not Stirred - Automated Discovery of Subtle Attacks on Protocols using Mix-NetsJannik Dreier, Pascal Lafourcade, Dhekra MahmoudUSENIX Security 2024 · 2 citations
- Machine-checking Multi-Round Proofs of Shuffle: Terelius-Wikstrom and Bayer-GrothThomas Haines, Rajeev Goré, Mukesh TiwariUSENIX Security 2023
- Ring of Gyges: Accountable Anonymous Broadcast via Secret-Shared ShuffleWentao Dong, Peipei Jiang, Huayi Duan, Cong Wang et al.NDSS 2025
Builds on3
- BeleniosRF: A Non-interactive Receipt-Free Electronic Voting SchemePyrros Chaidos, Véronique Cortier, Georg Fuchsbauer, David GalindoCCS 2016 · 99 citations
- How not to prove your election outcomeThomas Haines, Sarah Jamie Lewis, Olivier Pereira, Vanessa TeagueS&P 2020 · 57 citations
- Verified Verifiers for Verifying ElectionsThomas Haines, Rajeev Goré, Mukesh TiwariCCS 2019 · 14 citations
Related papers
- MAYA: A Short Shuffle Argument With Fast VerificationThi Van Thao Doan, Olivier Pereira, Thomas PetersCCS 2026
- Verifiable Mix-Nets and Distributed Decryption for Voting from Lattice-Based AssumptionsDiego F. Aranha, Carsten Baum, Kristian Gjøsteen, Tjerand SildeCCS 2023 · 20 citations
- ElectionGuard: a Cryptographic Toolkit to Enable Verifiable ElectionsJosh Benaloh, Michael Naehrig, Olivier Pereira, Dan S. WallachUSENIX Security 2024 · 12 citations
- Bust a Shuffle! A Formal Privacy Analysis of Voting Protocols with Multi-Server Mix NetsAlexandre Debant, Robert Künnemann, Johannes MüllerCCS 2026
- Practical Quantum-Safe Voting from LatticesRafaël del Pino, Vadim Lyubashevsky, Gregory Neven, Gregor SeilerCCS 2017 · 51 citations
