Verifiable Mix-Nets and Distributed Decryption for Voting from Lattice-Based Assumptions
Diego F. Aranha, Carsten Baum, Kristian Gjøsteen, Tjerand Silde
Abstract
Cryptographic voting protocols have recently seen much interest from practitioners due to their (planned) use in countries such as Estonia, Switzerland, France, and Australia. Practical protocols usually rely on tested designs such as the mixing-and-decryption paradigm. There, multiple servers verifiably shuffle encrypted ballots, which are then decrypted in a distributed manner. While several efficient protocols implementing this paradigm exist from discrete log-type assumptions, the situation is less clear for post-quantum alternatives such as lattices. This is because the design ideas of the discrete log-based voting protocols do not carry over easily to the lattice setting, due to specific problems such as noise growth and approximate relations.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Olingo: Threshold Lattice Signatures with DKG and Identifiable AbortKamil Doruk Gur, Patrick Hough, Jonathan Katz, Caroline Sandsbråten et al.CCS 2026
- Lether: Practical Post-Quantum Account-Based Private Blockchain PaymentsHongxiao Wang, Muhammed F. Esgin, Ron Steinfeld, Siu-Ming YiuCCS 2026
Related papers
- How not to prove your election outcomeThomas Haines, Sarah Jamie Lewis, Olivier Pereira, Vanessa TeagueS&P 2020 · 57 citations
- Did you mix me? Formally Verifying Verifiable Mix Nets in Electronic VotingThomas Haines, Rajeev Goré, Bhavesh SharmaS&P 2021 · 14 citations
- MAYA: A Short Shuffle Argument With Fast VerificationThi Van Thao Doan, Olivier Pereira, Thomas PetersCCS 2026
- Practical Quantum-Safe Voting from LatticesRafaël del Pino, Vadim Lyubashevsky, Gregory Neven, Gregor SeilerCCS 2017 · 51 citations
- MatRiCT: Efficient, Scalable and Post-Quantum Blockchain Confidential Transactions ProtocolMuhammed F. Esgin, Raymond K. Zhao, Ron Steinfeld, Joseph K. Liu et al.CCS 2019 · 104 citations
