Online Learning with Sublinear Best-Action Queries
Matteo Russo, Andrea Celli, Riccardo Colini-Baldeschi, Federico Fusco, Daniel Haimovich, Dima Karamshuk, Stefano Leonardi, Niek Tax
Abstract
In online learning, a decision maker repeatedly selects one of a set of actions, with the goal of minimizing the overall loss incurred. Following the recent line of research on algorithms endowed with additional predictive features, we revisit this problem by allowing the decision maker to acquire additional information on the actions to be selected. In particular, we study the power of best-action queries, which reveal beforehand the identity of the best action at a given time step. In practice, predictive features may be expensive, so we allow the decision maker to issue at most such queries. We establish tight bounds on the performance any algorithm can achieve when given access to best-action queries for different types of feedback models. In particular, we prove that in the full feedback model, queries are enough to achieve an optimal regret of . This finding highlights the significant multiplicative advantage in the regret rate achievable with even a modest (sublinear) number of queries. Additionally, we study the challenging setting in which the only available feedback is obtained during the time steps corresponding to the best-action queries. There, we provide a tight regret rate of , which improves over the standard regret rate for label efficient prediction for .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c60936fe-9cc6-4f74-af1c-2798ab2b2eb6Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on10
- Online metric algorithms with untrusted predictionsAntonios Antoniadis, Christian Coester, Marek Eliás, Adam Polak et al.ICML 2020 · 170 citations
- Online Scheduling via Learned WeightsSilvio Lattanzi, Thomas Lavastida, Benjamin Moseley, Sergei VassilvitskiiSODA 2020 · 83 citations
- Online Learning with Imperfect HintsAditya Bhaskara, Ashok Cutkosky, Ravi Kumar, Manish PurohitICML 2020 · 64 citations
- Sorting with PredictionsXingjian Bai, Christian CoesterNeurIPS 2023 · 29 citations
- Logarithmic Regret from Sublinear HintsAditya Bhaskara, Ashok Cutkosky, Ravi Kumar, Manish PurohitNeurIPS 2021 · 23 citations
Related papers
- Bandit Online Linear Optimization with Hints and QueriesAditya Bhaskara, Ashok Cutkosky, Ravi Kumar, Manish PurohitICML 2023 · 4 citations
- Understanding the Role of Feedback in Online Learning with Switching CostsDuo Cheng, Xingyu Zhou, Bo JiICML 2023 · 6 citations
- Linear Bandits with Feature FeedbackUrvashi Oswal, Aniruddha Bhargava, Robert NowakAAAI 2020 · 6 citations
- On Adaptivity in Information-Constrained Online LearningSiddharth Mitra, Aditya GopalanAAAI 2020 · 4 citations
- Bayesian Optimization from Human Feedback: Near-Optimal Regret BoundsAya Kayal, Sattar Vakili, Laura Toni, Da-shan Shiu et al.ICML 2025
