Avoiding Catastrophe in Online Learning by Asking for Help
Benjamin Plaut, Hanlin Zhu, Stuart Russell
Abstract
Most learning algorithms with formal regret guarantees assume that all mistakes are recoverable and essentially rely on trying all possible behaviors. This approach is problematic when some mistakes are catastrophic, i.e., irreparable. We propose an online learning problem where the goal is to minimize the chance of catastrophe. Specifically, we assume that the payoff in each round represents the chance of avoiding catastrophe in that round and try to maximize the product of payoffs (the overall chance of avoiding catastrophe) while allowing a limited number of queries to a mentor. We also assume that the agent can transfer knowledge between similar inputs. We first show that in general, any algorithm either queries the mentor at a linear rate or is nearly guaranteed to cause catastrophe. However, in settings where the mentor policy class is learnable in the standard online model, we provide an algorithm whose regret and rate of querying the mentor both approach 0 as the time horizon grows. Although our focus is the product of payoffs, we provide matching bounds for the typical additive regret. Conceptually, if a policy class is learnable in the absence of catastrophic risk, it is learnable in the presence of catastrophic risk if the agent can ask for help.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b9626702-cde4-46f3-b9ca-aac8bf452fb2Builds on7
- Learning Policies with Zero or Bounded Constraint Violation for Constrained MDPsTao Liu, Ruida Zhou, Dileep Kalathil, Panganamala R. Kumar et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 110 citations
- Oracle-Efficient Online Learning for Smoothed AdversariesNika Haghtalab, Yanjun Han, Abhishek Shetty, Kunhe YangNeurIPS 2022 · 25 citations
- There Is No Turning Back: A Self-Supervised Approach for Reversibility-Aware Reinforcement LearningNathan Grinsztajn, Johan Ferret, Olivier Pietquin, Philippe Preux et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 23 citations
- Fairness and Welfare Quantification for Regret in Multi-Armed BanditsSiddharth Barman, Arindam Khan, Arnab Maiti, Ayush SawarniAAAI 2023 · 18 citations
- Smoothed Analysis with Adaptive AdversariesNika Haghtalab, Tim Roughgarden, Abhishek ShettyFOCS 2021 · 4 citations
Related papers
- Online Learning with Unknown ConstraintsKarthik Sridharan, Seung Won Wilson YooICML 2025
- Learning Optimal Contracts: How to Exploit Small Action SpacesFrancesco Bacchiocchi, Matteo Castiglioni, Alberto Marchesi, Nicola GattiICLR 2024 · 21 citations
- Best of Both Worlds: Regret Minimization versus Minimax PlayAdrian Müller, Jon Schneider, Stratis Skoulakis, Luca Viano et al.ICML 2025
- On Optimal Robustness to Adversarial Corruption in Online Decision ProblemsShinji ItoNeurIPS 2021 · 28 citations
- Online Learning with Bounded RecallJon Schneider, Kiran VodrahalliICML 2024 · 1 citation
