Oracle-Efficient Online Learning for Smoothed Adversaries
Nika Haghtalab, Yanjun Han, Abhishek Shetty, Kunhe Yang
Abstract
We study the design of computationally efficient online learning algorithms under smoothed analysis. In this setting, at every step an adversary generates a sample from an adaptively chosen distribution whose density is upper bounded by 1/ times the uniform density. Given access to an offline optimization (ERM) oracle, we give the first computationally efficient online algorithms whose sublinear regret depends only on the pseudo/VC dimension d of the class and the smoothness parameter . In particular, we achieve oracle-efficient regret bounds of O( p T d 1 ) for learning real-valued functions and O( 2 ) for learning binary-valued functions. Our results establish that online learning is computationally as easy as offline learning, under the smoothed analysis framework. This contrasts the computational separation between online learning with worst-case adversaries and offline learning established by [HK16] . Our algorithms also achieve improved bounds for some settings with binary-valued functions and worst-case adversaries. These include an oracle-efficient algorithm with O( p T (d|X |) 1/2 ) regret that refines the earlier O( p T |X |) bound of [DS16] for finite domains, and an oracle-efficient algorithm with O(T 3/4 d 1/2 ) regret for the transductive setting. 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022). Method Reference Binary e O ⇣ p dT log( 1 ) ⌘ [HRS22, Thm 3.1] Real-values e O ⇣ p dT log( 1 ) ⌘ Thm F.1 Binary e O ⇣ p dT 1/2 ⌘ Thm 3.2 e O ⇣ p dT 1 ⌘ Thm 3.1 Alg-independent ⌦ ⇣ p T (d/ ) 1/2 ⌘ Thm 5.1 Algorithms 1 and 2 ⌦ ⇣ p dT 1/2 ⌘ Thm E.1 Small-domain O ⇣ p T (d|X |) 1/2 ⌘ Cor 3.3 Transductive learning O ⇣ T 3/4 d 1/4 ⌘ Cor 3.3 Regret Bound Statistical Upper Bound Prob. Coupling and ✏-Net Computational Upper Bound FTPL with Poissonization 1 oracle call per round Real/Binary-valued Relax-and-Randomize 2 oracle calls per round Lower Bound Construction for runtime o( p d/ ) Classical Settings FTPL with Poissonization
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers9
- Scalable Online Exploration via CoverabilityPhilip Amortila, Dylan J. Foster, Akshay KrishnamurthyICML 2024 · 10 citations
- Group-wise oracle-efficient algorithms for online multi-group learningSamuel Deng, Jingwen Liu, Daniel J. HsuNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
- The Role of Transparency in Repeated First-Price Auctions with Unknown ValuationsNicolò Cesa-Bianchi, Tommaso Cesari, Roberto Colomboni, Federico Fusco et al.STOC 2024 · 6 citations
- Oracle-Efficient Differentially Private Learning with Public DataAdam Block, Mark Bun, Rathin Desai, Abhishek Shetty et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- Smoothed Analysis of Learning from Positive SamplesJane H. Lee, Anay Mehrotra, Manolis ZampetakisSTOC 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on3
- Smoothed Analysis of Online and Differentially Private LearningNika Haghtalab, Tim Roughgarden, Abhishek ShettyNeurIPS 2020 · 66 citations
- Online Learning with Imperfect HintsAditya Bhaskara, Ashok Cutkosky, Ravi Kumar, Manish PurohitICML 2020 · 64 citations
- Smoothed Analysis with Adaptive AdversariesNika Haghtalab, Tim Roughgarden, Abhishek ShettyFOCS 2021 · 4 citations
Related papers
- Online Classification with PredictionsVinod Raman, Ambuj TewariNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- Smoothed Online Classification can be Harder than Batch ClassificationVinod Raman, Unique Subedi, Ambuj TewariNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
- Adaptive Oracle-Efficient Online LearningGuanghui Wang, Zihao Hu, Vidya Muthukumar, Jacob D. AbernethyNeurIPS 2022 · 7 citations
- Tradeoffs between Mistakes and ERM Oracle Calls in Online and Transductive Online LearningIdan Attias, Steve Hanneke, Arvind RamaswamiNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Agnostic Smoothed Online LearningMoïse BlanchardSTOC 2025 · 4 citations
