Compositional Conservatism: A Transductive Approach in Offline Reinforcement Learning
Yeda Song, Dongwook Lee, Gunhee Kim
Abstract
Offline reinforcement learning (RL) is a compelling framework for learning optimal policies from past experiences without additional interaction with the environment. Nevertheless, offline RL inevitably faces the problem of distributional shifts, where the states and actions encountered during policy execution may not be in the training dataset distribution. A common solution involves incorporating conservatism into the policy or the value function to safeguard against uncertainties and unknowns. In this work, we focus on achieving the same objectives of conservatism but from a different perspective. We propose COmpositional COnservatism with Anchor-seeking (COCOA) for offline RL, an approach that pursues conservatism in a compositional manner on top of the transductive reparameterization (Netanyahu et al., 2023) , which decomposes the input variable (the state in our case) into an anchor and its difference from the original input. Our COCOA seeks both in-distribution anchors and differences by utilizing the learned reverse dynamics model, encouraging conservatism in the compositional input space for the policy or value function. Such compositional conservatism is independent of and agnostic to the prevalent behavioral conservatism in offline RL. We apply COCOA to four state-of-the-art offline RL algorithms and evaluate them on the D4RL benchmark, where COCOA generally improves the performance of each algorithm. The code is available at https://github.com/runamu/compositionalconservatism .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c5e733b1-1f0c-4ac3-8741-ca8a458f9bf9Cited by top-tier papers2
- Compositional Transduction with Latent Analogies for Offline Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement LearningJunseok Kim, Dohyeong Kim, Mineui Hong, Songhwai OhICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Relational Structural Causal ModelsAdiba Ejaz, Elias BareinboimICML 2026
Builds on19
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy OptimizationTianhe Yu, Garrett Thomas, Lantao Yu, Stefano Ermon et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 989 citations
- MOReL: Model-Based Offline Reinforcement LearningRahul Kidambi, Aravind Rajeswaran, Praneeth Netrapalli, Thorsten JoachimsNeurIPS 2020 · 870 citations
- COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy OptimizationTianhe Yu, Aviral Kumar, Rafael Rafailov, Aravind Rajeswaran et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 549 citations
Related papers
- Mildly Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningJiafei Lyu, Xiaoteng Ma, Xiu Li, Zongqing LuNeurIPS 2022 · 173 citations
- Mutual Information Regularized Offline Reinforcement LearningXiao Ma, Bingyi Kang, Zhongwen Xu, Min Lin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 14 citations
- Reining Generalization in Offline Reinforcement Learning via Representation DistinctionYi Ma, Hongyao Tang, Dong Li, Zhaopeng MengNeurIPS 2023 · 19 citations
- Confidence-Conditioned Value Functions for Offline Reinforcement LearningJoey Hong, Aviral Kumar, Sergey LevineICLR 2023 · 4 citations
- Behavior Proximal Policy OptimizationZifeng Zhuang, Kun Lei, Jinxin Liu, Donglin Wang et al.ICLR 2023 · 8 citations
