Behavior Proximal Policy Optimization
Zifeng Zhuang, Kun Lei, Jinxin Liu, Donglin Wang, Yilang Guo
Abstract
Offline reinforcement learning (RL) is a challenging setting where existing offpolicy actor-critic methods perform poorly due to the overestimation of out-ofdistribution state-action pairs. Thus, various additional augmentations are proposed to keep the learned policy close to the offline dataset (or the behavior policy). In this work, starting from the analysis of offline monotonic policy improvement, we get a surprising finding that some online on-policy algorithms are naturally able to solve offline RL. Specifically, the inherent conservatism of these on-policy algorithms is exactly what the offline RL method needs to overcome the overestimation. Based on this, we propose Behavior Proximal Policy Optimization (BPPO), which solves offline RL without any extra constraint or regularization introduced compared to PPO. Extensive experiments on the D4RL benchmark indicate this extremely succinct method outperforms state-of-the-art offline RL algorithms. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/Dragon-Zhuang/BPPO . INTRODUCTION Typically, reinforcement learning (RL) is thought of as a paradigm for online learning, where the agent interacts with the environment to collect experience and then uses that to improve itself (Sutton et al., 1998) . This online process poses the biggest obstacles to real-world RL applications because of expensive or even risky data collection in some fields (such as navigation (Mirowski et al., 2018) and healthcare (Yu et al., 2021a)). As an alternative, offline RL eliminates the online interaction and learns from a fixed dataset, collected by some arbitrary and possibly unknown process (Lange et al., 2012; Fu et al., 2020) . The prospect of this data-driven mode (Levine et al., 2020) is pretty encouraging and has been placed with great expectations for solving RL real-world applications. Unfortunately, the major superiority of offline RL, the lack of online interaction, also raises another challenge. The classical off-policy iterative algorithms should be applicable to the offline setting since it is sound to regard offline RL as a more severe off-policy case. But all of them tend to underperform due to the overestimation of out-of-distribution (shorted as OOD) actions. In policy evaluation, the Q-function will poorly estimate the value of OOD state-action pairs. This in turn affects the policy improvement, where the agent trends to take the OOD actions with erroneously estimated high values, resulting in low-performance (Fujimoto et al., 2019) . Thus, some solutions keep the learned policy close to the behavior policy to overcome the overestimation (Fujimoto et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2019) . Most offline RL algorithms adopt online interactions to select hyperparameters. This is because offline hyperparameter selection, which selects hyperparameters without online interactions, is always an open problem lacking satisfactory solutions (Paine et al., 2020; Zhang & Jiang, 2021) . Deploying the policy learned by offline RL is potentially risky in certain areas (Mirowski et al., 2018; Yu et al., 2021a) since the performance is unknown. However, if the deployed policy can guarantee better performance than the behavior policy, the risk during online interactions will be greatly reduced. This inspires us to consider how to use offline dataset to improve behavior policy with a monotonic performance guarantee. We formulate this problem as offline monotonic policy improvement.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 908cd9b8-1c31-4a9b-b7ec-b0ea579f886eCited by top-tier papers24
- Revisiting the Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningDenis Tarasov, Vladislav Kurenkov, Alexander Nikulin, Sergey KolesnikovNeurIPS 2023 · 148 citations
- ChiPFormer: Transferable Chip Placement via Offline Decision TransformerYao Lai, Jinxin Liu, Zhentao Tang, Bin Wang et al.ICML 2023 · 69 citations
- The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That FitDylan Zhang, Qirun Dai, Hao PengNeurIPS 2025 · 59 citations
- Beyond Reward: Offline Preference-guided Policy OptimizationYachen Kang, Diyuan Shi, Jinxin Liu, Li He et al.ICML 2023 · 41 citations
- Uni-O4: Unifying Online and Offline Deep Reinforcement Learning with Multi-Step On-Policy OptimizationKun Lei, Zhengmao He, Chenhao Lu, Kaizhe Hu et al.ICLR 2024 · 31 citations
Builds on15
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingLili Chen, Kevin Lu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Kimin Lee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,557 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,292 citations
- Uncertainty-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Diversified Q-EnsembleGaon An, Seungyong Moon, Jang-Hyun Kim, Hyun Oh SongNeurIPS 2021 · 430 citations
Related papers
- Iteratively Refined Behavior Regularization for Offline Reinforcement LearningYi Ma, Jianye Hao, Xiaohan Hu, Yan Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations
- Critic Regularized RegressionZiyu Wang, Alexander Novikov, Konrad Zolna, Josh Merel et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 406 citations
- Pessimistic Bootstrapping for Uncertainty-Driven Offline Reinforcement LearningChenjia Bai, Lingxiao Wang, Zhuoran Yang, Zhi-Hong Deng et al.ICLR 2022 · 173 citations
- Mildly Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningJiafei Lyu, Xiaoteng Ma, Xiu Li, Zongqing LuNeurIPS 2022 · 173 citations
- Offline RL Without Off-Policy EvaluationDavid Brandfonbrener, Will Whitney, Rajesh Ranganath, Joan BrunaNeurIPS 2021 · 217 citations
