Location Not Found: Exposing Implicit Local and Global Biases in Multilingual LLMs
Guy Mor-Lan, Omer Goldman, Matan Eyal, Adi Mayrav Gilady, Sivan Eiger, Idan Szpektor, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias, Reut Tsarfaty
Abstract
Work done at Google Research Multilingual large language models (LLMs) have minimized the fluency gap between languages. This advancement, however, exposes models to the risk of biased behavior, as knowledge and norms may propagate across languages. In this work, we aim to quantify models' interand intra-lingual biases, via their ability to answer locale-ambiguous questions. To this end, we present LocQA, a test set containing 2,156 questions in 12 languages, referring to various locale-dependent facts such as laws, dates, and measurements. The questions do not contain indications of the locales they relate to, other than the querying language itself. LLMs' responses to LocQA locale-ambiguous questions thus reveal models' implicit priors. We used LocQA to evaluate 32 models, and detected two types of structural biases. Inter-lingually, we show a global bias towards answers relevant to the US-locale, even when models are asked in languages other than English. Moreover, we discovered that this global bias is exacerbated in models that underwent instruction tuning, compared to their base counterparts. Intra-lingually, we show that when multiple locales are relevant for the same language, models act as demographic probability engines, prioritizing locales with larger populations. Taken together, insights from LocQA may help in shaping LLMs' desired local behavior, and in quantifying the impact of various training phases on different kinds of biases. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c5084ae5-c6ed-40e6-bbbe-ba13ef565083Builds on7
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Global MMLU: Understanding and Addressing Cultural and Linguistic Biases in Multilingual EvaluationShivalika Singh, Angelika Romanou, Clémentine Fourrier, David Ifeoluwa Adelani et al.ACL 2025 · 144 citations
- GeoMLAMA: Geo-Diverse Commonsense Probing on Multilingual Pre-Trained Language ModelsDa Yin, Hritik Bansal, Masoud Monajatipoor, Liunian Harold Li et al.EMNLP 2022 · 27 citations
- Mitigating the Alignment Tax of RLHFYong Lin, Hangyu Lin, Wei Xiong, Shizhe Diao et al.EMNLP 2024 · 18 citations
- CulturalBench: A Robust, Diverse and Challenging Benchmark for Measuring LMs' Cultural Knowledge Through Human-AI Red-TeamingYu Ying Chiu, Liwei Jiang, Bill Yuchen Lin, Chan Young Park et al.ACL 2025
Related papers
- XLQA: A Benchmark for Locale-Aware Multilingual Open-Domain Question AnsweringKeon-Woo Roh, Yeong-Joon Ju, Seong-Whan LeeEMNLP 2025
- How Much Do LLMs Hallucinate across Languages? On Realistic Multilingual Estimation of LLM HallucinationSaad Obaid ul Islam, Anne Lauscher, Goran GlavasEMNLP 2025
- Do You Know About My Nation? Investigating Multilingual Language Models' Cultural Literacy Through Factual KnowledgeEshaan Tanwar, Anwoy Chatterjee, Michael Saxon, Alon Albalak et al.EMNLP 2025 · 4 citations
- Is Your Chatbot a Tourist or a Townie? Quantifying Geographic and Localness Disparities in LLM Representations of Place CSCW022Zihan Gao, Jacob Thebault-SpiekerCSCW 2026 · 2 citations
- Who is better at math, Jenny or Jingzhen? Uncovering Stereotypes in Large Language ModelsZara Siddique, Liam D. Turner, Luis Espinosa AnkeEMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
