CoEvol: Constructing Better Responses for Instruction Finetuning through Multi-Agent Cooperation
Renhao Li, Minghuan Tan, Derek F. Wong, Min Yang
Abstract
In recent years, instruction fine-tuning (IFT) on large language models (LLMs) has garnered considerable attention to enhance model performance on unseen tasks. Attempts have been made on automatic construction and effective selection for IFT data. However, we posit that previous methods have not fully harnessed the potential of LLMs for enhancing data quality. The responses within IFT data could be further enhanced by leveraging the capabilities of LLMs themselves. In this paper, we propose COEVOL, an LLM-based multiagent cooperation framework for the improvement of responses for instructions. To effectively refine the responses, we develop an iterative framework following a debate-adviseedit-judge paradigm. A two-stage multi-agent debate strategy is further devised to ensure the diversity and reliability of editing suggestions within the framework. Empirically, models equipped with COEVOL outperform competitive baselines evaluated by MT-Bench and Al-pacaEval, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing instruction-following capabilities for LLMs. 1 * Equal contribution. † Under the Joint Ph.D. Program between UM and SIAT.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c4fcf208-0d21-4f3f-9fd6-85efac6c79f8Cited by top-tier papers3
- Multi-Agent-as-Judge: Aligning LLM-Agent-Based Automated Evaluation with Multi-Dimensional Human EvaluationJiaju Chen, Yuxuan Lu, Xiaojie Wang, Huimin Zeng et al.ACL 2026 · 30 citations
- Collaborative Reasoner: Self-Improving Social Agents with Synthetic ConversationsAnsong Ni, Ruta Desai, Yang Li, Xinjie Lei et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- BELLE: A Bi-Level Multi-Agent Reasoning Framework for Multi-Hop Question AnsweringTaolin Zhang, Dongyang Li, Qizhou Chen, Chengyu Wang et al.ACL 2025
Builds on22
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent DebateYilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al.ICML 2024 · 1,562 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
Related papers
- Evoke: Evoking Critical Thinking Abilities in LLMs via Reviewer-Author Prompt EditingXinyu Hu, Pengfei Tang, Simiao Zuo, Zihan Wang et al.ICLR 2024 · 14 citations
- Automatic Instruction Evolving for Large Language ModelsWeihao Zeng, Can Xu, Yingxiu Zhao, Jian-Guang Lou et al.EMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- MMIFEvol: Towards Evolutionary Multimodal Instruction FollowingHaoyu Wang, Sihang Jiang, Xiangru Zhu, Yuyan Chen et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Coevolving with the Other You: Fine-Tuning LLM with Sequential Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningHao Ma, Tianyi Hu, Zhiqiang Pu, Boyin Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 54 citations
- From Selection to Refinement: Iterative Optimization for Instruction DataHang Hu, Ziyan Liu, Rujie Wen, Ruihui Hou et al.ACL 2026
