Predicting Trust In Autonomous Vehicles: Modeling Young Adult Psychosocial Traits, Risk-Benefit Attitudes, And Driving Factors With Machine Learning
Robert A. Kaufman, Emi Lee, Manas Satish Bedmutha, David Kirsh, Nadir Weibel
Abstract
Low trust remains a significant barrier to Autonomous Vehicle (AV) adoption. To design trustworthy AVs, we need to better understand the individual traits, attitudes, and experiences that impact people's trust judgements. We use machine learning to understand the most important factors that contribute to young adult trust based on a comprehensive set of personal factors gathered via survey (n = 1457). Factors ranged from psychosocial and cognitive attributes to driving style, experiences, and perceived AV risks and benefits. Using the explainable AI technique SHAP, we found that perceptions of AV risks and benefits, attitudes toward feasibility and usability, institutional trust, prior experience, and a person's mental model are the most important predictors. Surprisingly, psychosocial and many technology- and driving-specific factors were not strong predictors. Results highlight the importance of individual differences for designing trustworthy AVs for diverse groups and lead to key implications for future design and research.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c4389f7e-71b8-4d1c-9f0f-fced5c6a86daCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- Who Is Included in Human Perceptions of AI?: Trust and Perceived Fairness around Healthcare AI and Cultural MistrustMin Kyung Lee, Katherine RichCHI 2021 · 135 citations
- Person-Centered Predictions of Psychological Constructs with Social Media Contextualized by Multimodal SensingKoustuv Saha, Ted Grover, Stephen M. Mattingly, Vedant Das Swain et al.UbiComp 2021 · 45 citations
- Who's in the Crowd Matters: Cognitive Factors and Beliefs Predict Misinformation Assessment AccuracyRobert A. Kaufman, Michael Robert Haupt, Steven P. DowCSCW 2022 · 27 citations
- MoodCapture: Depression Detection using In-the-Wild Smartphone ImagesSubigya Nepal, Arvind Pillai, Weichen Wang, Tess Griffin et al.CHI 2024 · 22 citations
- ConverSense: An Automated Approach to Assess Patient-Provider Interactions using Social SignalsManas Satish Bedmutha, Anuujin Tsedenbal, Kelly Tobar, Sarah Borsotto et al.CHI 2024 · 15 citations
Related papers
- When to Explain: Modeling User Need for Explanations in Real-World Autonomous DrivingShihong Ling, Yaohan Ding, Yu Liu, Yue Wan et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- What and When to Explain?: On-road Evaluation of Explanations in Highly Automated VehiclesGwangbin Kim, Dohyeon Yeo, Taewoo Jo, Daniela Rus et al.UbiComp 2023 · 34 citations
- Towards Trustable SHAP ScoresOlivier Létoffé, Xuanxiang Huang, João Marques-SilvaAAAI 2025 · 23 citations
- Your Model Is Unfair, Are You Even Aware? Inverse Relationship Between Comprehension and Trust in Explainability Visualizations of Biased ML ModelsZhanna Kaufman, Madeline Endres, Cindy Xiong Bearfield, Yuriy BrunIEEE VIS 2025 · 2 citations
- Exploring Women's Perspectives on Learning and Trust in Automated Vehicles: A Socio-Ecological LensAlaa H. A Abusafia, Ronald Schroeter, Alessandro SoroCHI 2026 · 1 citation
