SORA: Free Second-Order Attacks in Fast Adversarial Training
Mazdak Teymourian, Ramtin Moslemi, Farzan Rahmani, Mohammad H Rohban
Abstract
Adversarial Training (AT) is a leading defense against adversarial examples but often suffers from Catastrophic Overfitting (CO) in efficient single-step variants, where robustness to multi-step attacks collapses despite high single-step performance. We address this failure mode with two contributions. First, we formalize Epsilon Overfitting (EO), a perspective in which fixed perturbation magnitudes and directions exacerbate CO, and show that introducing perturbation variability significantly improves robust generalization across different architectures and datasets. Second, we propose PertAlign (Perturbation Alignment), a theoretically grounded, computationally negligible metric that predicts CO onset by measuring gradient alignment across attack stages. Leveraging these insights, we introduce SORA , an adaptive step-size AT method that dynamically adjusts perturbations based on loss surface geometry. SORA consistently prevents CO, achieves state-of-the-art robustness and clean accuracy, and generalizes across datasets and architectures using a single fixed set of hyperparameters, which is essential for applicability in fast AT. Extensive experiments on diverse datasets and architectures show that SORA matches or surpasses the robustness of prior methods while delivering higher clean accuracy and superior efficiency. Code is available at https://github.com/SecondOrderAT/SORA .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c3f1e68a-9cc4-4ef1-b932-e39bd781641dBuilds on14
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
- Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial TrainingMaksym Andriushchenko, Nicolas FlammarionNeurIPS 2020 · 366 citations
- Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Single-step Adversarial TrainingHoki Kim, Woojin Lee, Jaewook LeeAAAI 2021 · 135 citations
- Guided Adversarial Attack for Evaluating and Enhancing Adversarial DefensesGaurang Sriramanan, Sravanti Addepalli, Arya Baburaj, Venkatesh Babu R.NeurIPS 2020 · 123 citations
Related papers
- Taxonomy Driven Fast Adversarial TrainingKun Tong, Chengze Jiang, Jie Gui, Yuan CaoAAAI 2024 · 2 citations
- Understanding and Increasing Efficiency of Frank-Wolfe Adversarial TrainingTheodoros Tsiligkaridis, Jay RobertsCVPR 2022 · 6 citations
- Efficient local linearity regularization to overcome catastrophic overfittingElías Abad-Rocamora, Fanghui Liu, Grigorios Chrysos, Pablo M. Olmos et al.ICLR 2024 · 9 citations
- Eliminating Catastrophic Overfitting Via Abnormal Adversarial Examples RegularizationRunqi Lin, Chaojian Yu, Tongliang LiuNeurIPS 2023 · 25 citations
- Subspace Adversarial TrainingTao Li, Yingwen Wu, Sizhe Chen, Kun Fang et al.CVPR 2022 · 59 citations
