Giving State to the Stateless: Augmenting Trustworthy Computation with Ledgers
Gabriel Kaptchuk, Matthew Green, Ian Miers
Abstract
In this work we investigate new computational properties that can be achieved by combining stateless trusted devices with public ledgers. We consider a hybrid paradigm in which a client-side device (such as a co-processor or trusted enclave) performs secure computation, while interacting with a public ledger via a possibly malicious host computer. We explore both the constructive and potentially destructive implications of such systems. We first show that this combination allows for the construction of stateful interactive functionalities (including general computation) even when the device has no persistent storage; this allows us to build sophisticated applications using inexpensive trusted hardware or even pure cryptographic obfuscation techniques. We further show how to use this paradigm to achieve censorship-resistant communication with a network, even when network communications are mediated by a potentially malicious host. Finally we describe a number of practical applications that can be achieved today. These include the synchronization of private smart contracts; rate limited mandatory logging; strong encrypted backups from weak passwords; enforcing fairness in multi-party computation; and destructive applications such as autonomous ransomware, which allows for payments without an online party.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers9
- ZEXE: Enabling Decentralized Private ComputationSean Bowe, Alessandro Chiesa, Matthew Green, Ian Miers et al.S&P 2020 · 257 citations
- SoK: SGX.Fail: How Stuff Gets eXposedStephan van Schaik, Alexander Seto, Thomas Yurek, Adam Batori et al.S&P 2024 · 52 citations
- FedServing: A Federated Prediction Serving Framework Based on Incentive MechanismJiasi Weng, Jian Weng, Hongwei Huang, Chengjun Cai et al.INFOCOM 2021 · 37 citations
- TEE.Fail: Breaking Trusted Execution Environments via DDR5 Memory Bus InterpositionJalen Chuang, Alexander Seto, Nicolás Berrios, Stephan van Schaik et al.S&P 2026 · 29 citations
- Nimble: Rollback Protection for Confidential Cloud ServicesSebastian Angel, Aditya Basu, Weidong Cui, Trent Jaeger et al.OSDI 2023 · 28 citations
Builds on8
- Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart ContractsAhmed E. Kosba, Andrew Miller, Elaine Shi, Zikai Wen et al.S&P 2016 · 2,201 citations
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 1,175 citations
- Town Crier: An Authenticated Data Feed for Smart ContractsFan Zhang, Ethan Cecchetti, Kyle Croman, Ari Juels et al.CCS 2016 · 668 citations
- ROTE: Rollback Protection for Trusted ExecutionSinisa Matetic, Mansoor Ahmed, Kari Kostiainen, Aritra Dhar et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 249 citations
- The Ring of Gyges: Investigating the Future of Criminal Smart ContractsAri Juels, Ahmed E. Kosba, Elaine ShiCCS 2016 · 199 citations
Related papers
- DISCO*: Distributed and SCalable Oblivious Joins and Oblivious PrimitivesApostolos Mavrogiannakis, Xian Wang, Ioannis Demertzis, Dimitrios Papadopoulos et al.SOSP 2026
- Jodes: Efficient Oblivious Join in the Distributed SettingYilei Wang, Xiangdong Zeng, Sheng Wang, Feifei LiVLDB 2025 · 1 citation
- BliMe: Verifiably Secure Outsourced Computation with Hardware-Enforced Taint TrackingHossam ElAtali, Lachlan J. Gunn, Hans Liljestrand, N. AsokanNDSS 2024
- BLACKOUT: Data-Oblivious Computation with Blinded CapabilitiesHossam ElAtali, Merve Gülmez, Thomas Nyman, N. AsokanCCS 2025
- BITE: Bitcoin Lightweight Client Privacy using Trusted ExecutionSinisa Matetic, Karl Wüst, Moritz Schneider, Kari Kostiainen et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 109 citations
