BliMe: Verifiably Secure Outsourced Computation with Hardware-Enforced Taint Tracking
Hossam ElAtali, Lachlan J. Gunn, Hans Liljestrand, N. Asokan
Abstract
Outsourced computing is widely used today. However, current approaches for protecting client data in outsourced computing fall short: use of cryptographic techniques like fully-homomorphic encryption incurs substantial costs, whereas use of hardware-assisted trusted execution environments has been shown to be vulnerable to run-time and side-channel attacks. We present Blinded Memory (BliMe), an architecture to realize efficient and secure outsourced computation. BliMe consists of a novel and minimal set of instruction set architecture (ISA) extensions implementing a taint-tracking policy to ensure the confidentiality of client data even in the presence of server vulnerabilities. To secure outsourced computation, the BliMe extensions can be used together with an attestable, fixed-function hardware security module (HSM) and an encryption engine that provides atomic decrypt-and-taint and encrypt-and-untaint operations. Clients rely on remote attestation and key agreement with the HSM to ensure that their data can be transferred securely to and from the encryption engine and will always be protected by BliMe's taint-tracking policy while at the server. We provide an RTL implementation BliMe-BOOM based on the BOOM RISC-V core. BliMe-BOOM requires no reduction in clock frequency relative to unmodified BOOM, and has minimal power () and FPGA resource () overheads. Various implementations of BliMe incur only moderate performance overhead (). We also provide a machine-checked security proof of a simplified model ISA with BliMe extensions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 58d44d40-e6ea-4d64-9297-915177273cecCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on21
- Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative ExecutionPaul Kocher, Jann Horn, Anders Fogh, Daniel Genkin et al.S&P 2019 · 2,435 citations
- Meltdown: Reading Kernel Memory from User SpaceMoritz Lipp, Michael Schwarz, Daniel Gruss, Thomas Prescher et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 1,456 citations
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 1,175 citations
- Sanctum: Minimal Hardware Extensions for Strong Software IsolationVictor Costan, Ilia A. Lebedev, Srinivas DevadasUSENIX Security 2016 · 649 citations
- Inferring Fine-grained Control Flow Inside SGX Enclaves with Branch ShadowingSangho Lee, Ming-Wei Shih, Prasun Gera, Taesoo Kim et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 536 citations
Related papers
- Data Oblivious ISA Extensions for Side Channel-Resistant and High Performance ComputingJiyong Yu, Lucas Hsiung, Mohamad El Hajj, Christopher W. FletcherNDSS 2019 · 106 citations
- SecTEE: A Software-based Approach to Secure Enclave Architecture Using TEEShijun Zhao, Qianying Zhang, Yu Qin, Wei Feng et al.CCS 2019 · 95 citations
- Cipherfix: Mitigating Ciphertext Side-Channel Attacks in SoftwareJan Wichelmann, Anna Pätschke, Luca Wilke, Thomas EisenbarthUSENIX Security 2023
- VirTEE: a full backward-compatible TEE with native live migration and secure I/OJianqiang Wang, Pouya Mahmoody, Ferdinand Brasser, Patrick Jauernig et al.DAC 2022 · 11 citations
- On (the Lack of) Code Confidentiality in Trusted Execution EnvironmentsIvan Puddu, Moritz Schneider, Daniele Lain, Stefano Boschetto et al.S&P 2024 · 14 citations
