Is Your Data Relevant?: Dynamic Selection of Relevant Data for Federated Learning
Lokesh Nagalapatti, Ruhi Sharma Mittal, Ramasuri Narayanam
Abstract
Federated Learning (FL) is a machine learning paradigm in which multiple clients participate to collectively learn a global machine learning model at the central server. Clients share updates derived from their local data to the server such that their privacy is not compromised. The server aggregates these updates and applies it to the global model. It is plausible that not all the data owned by each client is relevant to the server's learning objective. The updates incorporated from irrelevant data could be detrimental to the global model. The task of selecting relevant data is explored in traditional machine learning settings where the assumption is that all the data is available in one place. In FL settings, the data is distributed across multiple clients and the server can't introspect it. This precludes the application of traditional solutions to selecting relevant data here. In this paper, we propose an approach called Federated Learning with Relevant Data (F LRD), that facilitates clients to derive updates using relevant data. Each client learns a model called Relevant Data Selector (RDS) that is private to itself to do the selection. This in turn helps in building an effective global model. We perform experiments with multiple real-world datasets to demonstrate the efficacy of our solution. The results show (a) the capability of F LRD to identify relevant data samples at each client locally and (b) the superiority of the global model learned by F LRD over other baseline algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c38f7f78-a221-43f9-8793-3c7ca05973efCited by top-tier papers3
- SPACE: Single-round Participant Amalgamation for Contribution Evaluation in Federated LearningYi-Chung Chen, Hsi-Wen Chen, Shun-Gui Wang, Ming-Syan ChenNeurIPS 2023 · 11 citations
- FedUV: Uniformity and Variance for Heterogeneous Federated LearningHa Min Son, Moon-Hyun Kim, Tai-Myoung Chung, Chao Huang et al.CVPR 2024 · 11 citations
- ShapCCS: Shapley-Driven Client Coreset Selection in Federated LearningShuo Ji, Jie Hu, Zhouqiao He, Zijie Zhao et al.ICML 2026
Builds on2
Related papers
- Game of Gradients: Mitigating Irrelevant Clients in Federated LearningLokesh Nagalapatti, Ramasuri NarayanamAAAI 2021 · 106 citations
- Joint Local Relational Augmentation and Global Nash Equilibrium for Federated Learning with Non-IID DataXinting Liao, Chaochao Chen, Weiming Liu, Pengyang Zhou et al.ACM MM 2023 · 10 citations
- FedCSS: Joint Client-and-Sample Selection for Hard Sample-Aware Noise-Robust Federated LearningAnran Li, Yue Cao, Jiabao Guo, Hongyi Peng et al.SIGMOD 2024 · 11 citations
- Sample-level Data Selection for Federated LearningAnran Li, Lan Zhang, Juntao Tan, Yaxuan Qin et al.INFOCOM 2021 · 138 citations
- Data Valuation and Detections in Federated LearningWenqian Li, Shuran Fu, Fengrui Zhang, Yan PangCVPR 2024
