Game of Gradients: Mitigating Irrelevant Clients in Federated Learning
Lokesh Nagalapatti, Ramasuri Narayanam
Abstract
The paradigm of Federated learning (FL) deals with multiple clients participating in collaborative training of a machine learning model under the orchestration of a central server. In this setup, each client’s data is private to itself and is not transferable to other clients or the server. Though FL paradigm has received significant interest recently from the research community, the problem of selecting the relevant clients w.r.t. the central server's learning objective is under-explored. We refer to these problems as Federated Relevant Client Selection (FRCS). Because the server doesn't have explicit control over the nature of data possessed by each client, the problem of selecting relevant clients is significantly complex in FL settings. In this paper, we resolve important and related FRCS problems viz., selecting clients with relevant data, detecting clients that possess data relevant to a particular target label, and rectifying corrupted data samples of individual clients. We follow a principled approach to address the above FRCS problems and develop a new federated learning method using the Shapley value concept from cooperative game theory. Towards this end, we propose a cooperative game involving the gradients shared by the clients. Using this game, we compute Shapley values of clients and then present Shapley value based Federated Averaging (S-FedAvg) algorithm that empowers the server to select relevant clients with high probability. S-FedAvg turns out to be critical in designing specific algorithms to address the FRCS problems. We finally conduct a thorough empirical analysis on image classification and speech recognition tasks to show the superior performance of S-FedAvg than the baselines in the context of supervised federated learning settings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 397fbf90-1ab4-4b9c-94a4-ee2332ca1802Cited by top-tier papers10
- Secure Shapley Value for Cross-Silo Federated LearningShuyuan Zheng, Yang Cao, Masatoshi YoshikawaVLDB 2023 · 41 citations
- Fair yet Asymptotically Equal Collaborative LearningXiaoqiang Lin, Xinyi Xu, See-Kiong Ng, Chuan-Sheng Foo et al.ICML 2023 · 15 citations
- A Comprehensive Study of Shapley Value in Data AnalyticsHong Lin, Shixin Wan, Zhongle Xie, Ke Chen et al.VLDB 2025 · 4 citations
- CoAst: Validation-Free Contribution Assessment for Federated Learning based on Cross-Round ValuationHao Wu, Likun Zhang, Shucheng Li, Fengyuan Xu et al.ACM MM 2024 · 2 citations
- Improving Federated Domain Generalization Through Dynamical Weights Calculated from Data Influences on Global Model UpdateZikun Zhou, Wen Huang, Xingyi Wang, Zhishuo Zhang et al.AAAI 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on5
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID DataXiang Li, Kaixuan Huang, Wenhao Yang, Shusen Wang et al.ICLR 2020 · 2,930 citations
- Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task LearningTianhe Yu, Saurabh Kumar, Abhishek Gupta, Sergey Levine et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,261 citations
- Classification-Based Anomaly Detection for General DataLiron Bergman, Yedid HoshenICLR 2020 · 412 citations
- Task Agnostic Robust Learning on Corrupt Outputs by Correlation-Guided Mixture Density NetworksSungjoon Choi, Sanghoon Hong, Kyungjae Lee, Sungbin LimCVPR 2020
Related papers
- Is Your Data Relevant?: Dynamic Selection of Relevant Data for Federated LearningLokesh Nagalapatti, Ruhi Sharma Mittal, Ramasuri NarayanamAAAI 2022 · 32 citations
- ShapleyFL: Robust Federated Learning Based on Shapley ValueQiheng Sun, Xiang Li, Jiayao Zhang, Li Xiong et al.KDD 2023 · 57 citations
- Fair and Efficient Contribution Valuation for Vertical Federated LearningZhenan Fan, Huang Fang, Xinglu Wang, Zirui Zhou et al.ICLR 2024 · 33 citations
- FairFed: Improving Fairness and Efficiency of Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learning via Cooperative Shapley ValueYiqi Liu, Shan Chang, Ye Liu, Bo Li et al.INFOCOM 2024 · 20 citations
- ShapCCS: Shapley-Driven Client Coreset Selection in Federated LearningShuo Ji, Jie Hu, Zhouqiao He, Zijie Zhao et al.ICML 2026
