Transcendental Idealism of Planner: Evaluating Perception from Planning Perspective for Autonomous Driving
Weixin Li, Xiaodong Yang
Abstract
Evaluating the performance of perception modules in autonomous driving is one of the most critical tasks in developing the complex intelligent system. While module-level unit test metrics adopted from traditional computer vision tasks are feasible to some extent, it remains far less explored to measure the impact of perceptual noise on the driving quality of autonomous vehicles in a consistent and holistic manner. In this work, we propose a principled framework that provides a coherent and systematic understanding of the impact an error in the perception module imposes on an autonomous agent's planning that actually controls the vehicle. Specifically, the planning process is formulated as expected utility maximisation, where all input signals from upstream modules jointly provide a world state description, and the planner strives for the optimal action by maximising the expected utility determined by both world states and actions. We show that, under practical conditions, the objective function can be represented as an inner product between the world state description and the utility function in a Hilbert space. This geometric interpretation enables a novel way to analyse the impact of noise in world state estimation on planning and leads to a universal metric for evaluating perception. The whole framework resembles the idea of transcendental idealism in the classical philosophical literature, which gives the name to our approach.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- DistillBEV: Boosting Multi-Camera 3D Object Detection with Cross-Modal Knowledge DistillationZeyu Wang, Dingwen Li, Chenxu Luo, Cihang Xie et al.ICCV 2023 · 65 citations
- GEDepth: Ground Embedding for Monocular Depth EstimationXiaodong Yang, Zhuang Ma, Zhiyu Ji, Zhe RenICCV 2023 · 40 citations
Builds on12
- Exploring the Limitations of Behavior Cloning for Autonomous DrivingFelipe Codevilla, Eder Santana, Antonio M. López, Adrien GaidonICCV 2019 · 666 citations
- Exploring Simple 3D Multi-Object Tracking for Autonomous DrivingChenxu Luo, Xiaodong Yang, Alan L. YuilleICCV 2021 · 122 citations
- Revisiting 3D Object Detection From an Egocentric PerspectiveBoyang Deng, Charles R. Qi, Mahyar Najibi, Thomas A. Funkhouser et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 28 citations
- Learning to Evaluate Perception Models Using Planner-Centric MetricsJonah Philion, Amlan Kar, Sanja FidlerCVPR 2020
- nuScenes: A Multimodal Dataset for Autonomous DrivingHolger Caesar, Varun Bankiti, Alex H. Lang, Sourabh Vora et al.CVPR 2020
Related papers
- Planning-oriented Autonomous DrivingYihan Hu, Jiazhi Yang, Li Chen, Keyu Li et al.CVPR 2023
- World4Drive: End-to-End Autonomous Driving via Intention-Aware Physical Latent World ModelYupeng Zheng, Pengxuan Yang, Zebin Xing, Qichao Zhang et al.ICCV 2025 · 16 citations
- AnA: An Attentive Autonomous Driving SystemWonkyo Choe, Rongxiang Wang, Felix Xiaozhu LinASPLOS 2025
- Perception in Plan: Coupled Perception and Planning for End-to-End Autonomous DrivingBozhou Zhang, Jingyu Li, Nan Song, Li ZhangAAAI 2026
- UniDrive: Towards Universal Driving Perception Across Camera ConfigurationsYe Li, Wenzhao Zheng, Xiaonan Huang, Kurt KeutzerICLR 2025
