Restoring Pruned Large Language Models via Lost Component Compensation
Zijian Feng, Hanzhang Zhou, Zixiao Zhu, Tianjiao Li, Chua Jia Jim Deryl, Lee Onn Mak, Gee Wah Ng, Kezhi Mao
Abstract
Pruning is a widely used technique to reduce the size and inference cost of large language models (LLMs), but it often causes performance degradation. To mitigate this, existing restoration methods typically employ parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT), such as LoRA, to recover the pruned model's performance. However, most PEFT methods are designed for dense models and overlook the distinct properties of pruned models, often resulting in suboptimal recovery. In this work, we propose a targeted restoration strategy for pruned models that restores performance while preserving their low cost and high efficiency. We observe that pruning-induced information loss is reflected in attention activations, and selectively reintroducing components of this information can significantly recover model performance. Based on this insight, we introduce RestoreLCC (Restoring Pruned LLMs via Lost Component Compensation), a plug-and-play method that contrastively probes critical attention heads via activation editing, extracts lost components from activation differences, and finally injects them back into the corresponding pruned heads for compensation and recovery. RestoreLCC is compatible with structured, semi-structured, and unstructured pruning schemes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RestoreLCC consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both general and task-specific performance recovery, without compromising the sparsity or inference efficiency of pruned models 2 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c2362309-1ec9-4524-b7cb-14f9853323e2Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on23
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language ModelsXinyin Ma, Gongfan Fang, Xinchao WangNeurIPS 2023 · 994 citations
- A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language ModelsMingjie Sun, Zhuang Liu, Anna Bair, J. Zico KolterICLR 2024 · 794 citations
Related papers
- LaCo: Layer-wise Compensation for Pruned Large Language ModelsYingen Liu, Fan Wu, Xuyan Pan, Ruihui Li et al.ACL 2026
- From PEFT to DEFT: Parameter Efficient Finetuning for Reducing Activation Density in TransformersBharat Runwal, Tejaswini Pedapati, Pin-Yu ChenAAAI 2025 · 10 citations
- Soft Prompt Recovers Compressed LLMs, TransferablyZhaozhuo Xu, Zirui Liu, Beidi Chen, Shaochen (Henry) Zhong et al.ICML 2024 · 9 citations
- PASER: Post-Training Data Selection for Efficient Pruned Large Language Model RecoveryBowei He, Lihao Yin, Huiling Zhen, Xiaokun Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- P² Law: Scaling Law for Post-Training After Model PruningXiaodong Chen, Yuxuan Hu, Xiaokang Zhang, Yanling Wang et al.ACL 2025
