PASER: Post-Training Data Selection for Efficient Pruned Large Language Model Recovery
Bowei He, Lihao Yin, Huiling Zhen, Xiaokun Zhang, Mingxuan Yuan, Chen Ma
Abstract
Model pruning is an effective approach for compressing large language models (LLMs). However, this process often leads to significant degradation of model capabilities. While post-training techniques such as instruction tuning are commonly employed to recover model performance, existing methods often overlook the uneven deterioration of model capabilities and incur high computational costs. Moreover, some irrelevant instructions may also introduce negative effects to model capacity recovery. To address these challenges, we propose the Post-training dAta Selection method for Efficient pruned large language model Recovery (PASER). PASER aims to identify instructions to recover the most compromised model capacities with a certain data budget. Our approach first applies manifold learning and spectral clustering to group recovery instructions in the semantic space, revealing capability-specific instruction sets. Then, the data budget is adaptively allocated across clusters by the degree of corresponding model capability degradation. In each cluster, we prioritize data samples that lead to the most decline of model performance. To mitigate potential negative tuning effects, we also detect and filter out conflicting or irrelevant recovery data. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PASER significantly outperforms conventional baselines, effectively recovering the general capabilities of pruned LLMs while utilizing merely 4%-20% of the original post-training data. We provide the code repository in Link.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1773597d-38c6-405b-b911-91c9f834a888Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on32
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
Related papers
- P² Law: Scaling Law for Post-Training After Model PruningXiaodong Chen, Yuxuan Hu, Xiaokang Zhang, Yanling Wang et al.ACL 2025
- Restoring Pruned Large Language Models via Lost Component CompensationZijian Feng, Hanzhang Zhou, Zixiao Zhu, Tianjiao Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Data Selection for Fine-tuning Vision Language Models via Cross Modal Alignment TrajectoriesNilay Naharas, Dang Nguyen, Neslihan Bulut, MohammadHossein Bateni et al.ICML 2026 · 7 citations
- BRIEF: Bi-level Coreset Selection for Efficient Instruction Tuning in LLMsChaoyuan Shen, Chi Zhang, Chengliang Chai, Jiacheng Wang et al.VLDB 2026 · 2 citations
- Soft Prompt Recovers Compressed LLMs, TransferablyZhaozhuo Xu, Zirui Liu, Beidi Chen, Shaochen (Henry) Zhong et al.ICML 2024 · 9 citations
