Plurals: A System for Guiding LLMs via Simulated Social Ensembles
Joshua Ashkinaze, Emily Fry, Narendra Edara, Eric Gilbert, Ceren Budak
Abstract
Recent debates raised concerns that language models may favor certain viewpoints. But what if the solution is not to aim for a "view from nowhere" but rather to leverage different viewpoints? We introduce Plurals, a system and Python library for pluralistic AI deliberation. Plurals consists of Agents (LLMs, optionally with personas) which deliberate within customizable Structures, with Moderators overseeing deliberation. Plurals is a generator of simulated social ensembles. Plurals integrates with government datasets to create nationally representative personas, includes deliberation templates inspired by deliberative democracy, and allows users to customize both information-sharing structures and deliberation behavior within Structures. Six case studies demonstrate fidelity to theoretical constructs and efficacy. Three randomized experiments show simulated focus groups produced output resonant with an online sample of the relevant audiences (chosen over zero-shot generation in 75% of trials). Plurals is both a paradigm and a concrete system for pluralistic AI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c1ce0ca5-ac65-4c98-a5ec-b7ef6e2846d6Cited by top-tier papers5
- Deep Value Benchmark: Measuring Whether Models Generalize Deep Values or Shallow PreferencesJoshua Ashkinaze, Hua Shen, Sai Avula, Eric Gilbert et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Just-In-Time Objectives: A General Approach for Specialized AI InteractionsMichelle S. Lam, Omar Shaikh, Hallie Xu, Alice Guo et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Agent-Supported Foresight for AI Systemic Risks: AI Agents for Breadth, Experts for JudgmentLeon Fröhling, Alessandro Giaconia, Edyta Paulina Bogucka, Daniele QuerciaCHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Metric Distortion of Small-Group DeliberationAshish Goel, Mohak Goyal, Kamesh MunagalaSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Synthetic Socratic Debates: Examining Persona Effects on Moral Decision and Persuasion DynamicsJiarui Liu, Yueqi Song, Yunze Xiao, Mingqian Zheng et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on19
- ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent DebateChi-Min Chan, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Jianxuan Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 871 citations
- Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language ModelsMrinank Sharma, Meg Tong, Tomasz Korbak, David Duvenaud et al.ICLR 2024 · 762 citations
- Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail KnowledgeNikhil Kandpal, Haikang Deng, Adam Roberts, Eric Wallace et al.ICML 2023 · 623 citations
- Chain of Agents: Large Language Models Collaborating on Long-Context TasksYusen Zhang, Ruoxi Sun, Yanfei Chen, Tomas Pfister et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 297 citations
- Debating with More Persuasive LLMs Leads to More Truthful AnswersAkbir Khan, John Hughes, Dan Valentine, Laura Ruis et al.ICML 2024 · 244 citations
Related papers
- PerSpectra: A Scalable and Configurable Pluralist Benchmark of Perspectives from ArgumentsShangrui Nie, Kian Omoomi, Lucie Flek, Zhixue Zhao et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMsAndries P. Smit, Nathan Grinsztajn, Paul Duckworth, Thomas D. Barrett et al.ICML 2024 · 82 citations
- Multi-Agent-as-Judge: Aligning LLM-Agent-Based Automated Evaluation with Multi-Dimensional Human EvaluationJiaju Chen, Yuxuan Lu, Xiaojie Wang, Huimin Zeng et al.ACL 2026 · 30 citations
- Pluralistic Alignment for Healthcare: A Role-Driven FrameworkJiayou Zhong, Anudeex Shetty, Chao Jia, Xuanrui Lin et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Evaluating Language Model Pluralism through In-the-wild Crowd DiscussionsGagan Mundada, Rohan Surana, Nandhini Swaminathan, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder et al.ACL 2026
