PerSpectra: A Scalable and Configurable Pluralist Benchmark of Perspectives from Arguments
Shangrui Nie, Kian Omoomi, Lucie Flek, Zhixue Zhao, Charles Welch
Abstract
Pluralism, the capacity to engage with diverse perspectives without collapsing them into a single viewpoint, is critical for developing large language models that faithfully reflect human heterogeneity. Yet this characteristic has not been carefully examined within the LLM research community and remains absent from most alignment studies. Debate-oriented sources provide a natural entry point for pluralism research. Previous work builds on online debate sources but remains constrained by costly human validation. Other debate-rich platforms such as Reddit and Kialo 1 also offer promising material: Reddit provides linguistic diversity and scale but lacks clear argumentative structure, while Kialo supplies explicit pro/con graphs but remains overly concise and detached from natural discourse. We introduce PERSPECTRA, a pluralist benchmark that integrates the structural clarity of Kialo debate graphs with the linguistic diversity of real Reddit discussions. Using a controlled retrieval-and-expansion pipeline, we construct 3,810 enriched arguments spanning 762 pro/con stances on 100 controversial topics. Each opinion is expanded into multiple naturalistic variants, enabling robust evaluation of pluralism. We initialise three tasks with PERSPECTRA: opinion counting (identifying distinct viewpoints), opinion matching (aligning supporting stances and discourse to source opinions), and polarity check (inferring aggregate stance in mixed discourse). Experiments with state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary LLMs, highlight systematic failures, such as overestimating the number of viewpoints and misclassifying concessive structures, underscoring the difficulty of pluralism-aware understanding and reasoning. By combining diversity with structure, PERSPECTRA establishes the first scalable, configurable benchmark for evaluating how well models represent, distinguish, and reason over multiple perspectives. We release PERSPECTRA as a resource with flexible configurations, enabling the creation of tasks beyond the demo tasks presented in this paper, and fostering progress toward pluralism-sensitive systems that more faithfully capture human heterogeneity. The dataset is available on github page 2 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2494279c-bb6a-4494-88b2-69735dd5d30dBuilds on10
- Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?Shibani Santurkar, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Cinoo Lee et al.ICML 2023 · 764 citations
- Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and DiversityRobert Kirk, Ishita Mediratta, Christoforos Nalmpantis, Jelena Luketina et al.ICLR 2024 · 332 citations
- Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?Vishakh Padmakumar, He HeICLR 2024 · 173 citations
- MaxMin-RLHF: Alignment with Diverse Human PreferencesSouradip Chakraborty, Jiahao Qiu, Hui Yuan, Alec Koppel et al.ICML 2024 · 104 citations
- Cultivating Pluralism In Algorithmic Monoculture: The Community Alignment DatasetLily H Zhang, Smitha Milli, Karen Long Jusko, Jonathan Smith et al.ICLR 2026 · 41 citations
Related papers
- Evaluating Language Model Pluralism through In-the-wild Crowd DiscussionsGagan Mundada, Rohan Surana, Nandhini Swaminathan, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder et al.ACL 2026
- PluRule: A Benchmark for Moderating Pluralistic Communities on Social MediaZoher Kachwala, Bao Tran Truong, Rasika Muralidharan, Haewoon Kwak et al.ACL 2026
- Plurals: A System for Guiding LLMs via Simulated Social EnsemblesJoshua Ashkinaze, Emily Fry, Narendra Edara, Eric Gilbert et al.CHI 2025 · 8 citations
- Benchmarking Overton Pluralism in LLMsElinor Poole-Dayan, Jiayi Wu, Taylor Sorensen, Jiaxin Pei et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Perspectra: Choosing Your Experts Enhances Critical Thinking in Multi-Agent Research IdeationYiren Liu, Viraj Nischal Shah, Sangho Suh, Pao Siangliulue et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
