Quantification of Uncertainty with Adversarial Models
Kajetan Schweighofer, Lukas Aichberger, Mykyta Ielanskyi, Günter Klambauer, Sepp Hochreiter
Abstract
Quantifying uncertainty is important for actionable predictions in real-world applications. A crucial part of predictive uncertainty quantification is the estimation of epistemic uncertainty, which is defined as an integral of the product between a divergence function and the posterior. Current methods such as Deep Ensembles or MC dropout underperform at estimating the epistemic uncertainty, since they primarily consider the posterior when sampling models. We suggest Quantification of Uncertainty with Adversarial Models (QUAM) to better estimate the epistemic uncertainty. QUAM identifies regions where the whole product under the integral is large, not just the posterior. Consequently, QUAM has lower approximation error of the epistemic uncertainty compared to previous methods. Models for which the product is large correspond to adversarial models (not adversarial examples!). Adversarial models have both a high posterior as well as a high divergence between their predictions and that of a reference model. Our experiments show that QUAM excels in capturing epistemic uncertainty for deep learning models and outperforms previous methods on challenging tasks in the vision domain.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers8
- Enhancing Vision-Language Model Reliability with Uncertainty-Guided Dropout DecodingYixiong Fang, Ziran Yang, Zhaorun Chen, Zhuokai Zhao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 21 citations
- Rethinking Uncertainty Estimation in LLMs: A Principled Single-Sequence MeasureLukas Aichberger, Kajetan Schweighofer, Sepp HochreiterICLR 2026 · 12 citations
- Addressing Pitfalls in the Evaluation of Uncertainty Estimation Methods for Natural Language GenerationMykyta Ielanskyi, Kajetan Schweighofer, Lukas Aichberger, Sepp HochreiterICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification for Pretrained Neural NetworksHanjing Wang, Qiang JiCVPR 2024 · 5 citations
- Robust Adversarial Quantification via Conflict-Aware Evidential Deep LearningCharmaine Barker, Daniel Bethell, Simos GerasimouICLR 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on19
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of GeneralizationAndrew Gordon Wilson, Pavel IzmailovNeurIPS 2020 · 845 citations
- Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance AwarenessJeremiah Z. Liu, Zi Lin, Shreyas Padhy, Dustin Tran et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 604 citations
- Uncertainty Estimation Using a Single Deep Deterministic Neural NetworkJoost van Amersfoort, Lewis Smith, Yee Whye Teh, Yarin GalICML 2020 · 529 citations
- Laplace Redux - Effortless Bayesian Deep LearningErik A. Daxberger, Agustinus Kristiadi, Alexander Immer, Runa Eschenhagen et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 508 citations
Related papers
- Sampling-Free Epistemic Uncertainty Estimation Using Approximated Variance PropagationJanis Postels, Francesco Ferroni, Huseyin Coskun, Nassir Navab et al.ICCV 2019 · 153 citations
- Uncertainty-Aware Deep Classifiers Using Generative ModelsMurat Sensoy, Lance M. Kaplan, Federico Cerutti, Maryam SalekiAAAI 2020 · 88 citations
- Discretization-Induced Dirichlet Posterior for Robust Uncertainty Quantification on RegressionXuanlong Yu, Gianni Franchi, Jindong Gu, Emanuel AldeaAAAI 2024 · 10 citations
- Estimating Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty with a Single ModelMatthew Chan, Maria Molina, Chris MetzlerNeurIPS 2024 · 76 citations
- Hierarchical Uncertainty Estimation for Learning-based Registration in NeuroimagingXiaoling Hu, Karthik Gopinath, Peirong Liu, Malte Hoffmann et al.ICLR 2025
