Estimating Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty with a Single Model
Matthew Chan, Maria Molina, Chris Metzler
Abstract
Estimating and disentangling epistemic uncertainty, uncertainty that is reducible with more training data, and aleatoric uncertainty, uncertainty that is inherent to the task at hand, is critically important when applying machine learning to high-stakes applications such as medical imaging and weather forecasting. Conditional diffusion models' breakthrough ability to accurately and efficiently sample from the posterior distribution of a dataset now makes uncertainty estimation conceptually straightforward: One need only train and sample from a large ensemble of diffusion models. Unfortunately, training such an ensemble becomes computationally intractable as the complexity of the model architecture grows. In this work we introduce a new approach to ensembling, hyper-diffusion models (HyperDM), which allows one to accurately estimate both epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty with a single model. Unlike existing single-model uncertainty methods like Monte-Carlo dropout and Bayesian neural networks, HyperDM offers prediction accuracy on par with, and in some cases superior to, multi-model ensembles. Furthermore, our proposed approach scales to modern network architectures such as Attention U-Net and yields more accurate uncertainty estimates compared to existing methods. We validate our method on two distinct real-world tasks: x-ray computed tomography reconstruction and weather temperature forecasting.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 01d8cd90-37a9-4b6c-9b0c-1d785636243aCited by top-tier papers6
- Uncertainty Quantification with the Empirical Neural Tangent KernelJoseph Wilson, Chris van der Heide, Liam Hodgkinson, Fred RoostaNeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- Diffusion Epistemic Uncertainty with Asymmetric Learning for Diffusion-Generated Image DetectionYingsong Huang, Hui Guo, Jing Huang, Bing Bai et al.ICCV 2025 · 4 citations
- Epistemic Uncertainty for Generated Image DetectionJun Nie, Yonggang Zhang, Tongliang Liu, Yiu-ming Cheung et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Uncertainty-Aware Gaussian Map for Vision-Language NavigationJianzhe Gao, Rui Liu, Yuxuan Xu, Tongtong Cao et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Towards a Certificate of Trust: Task-Aware OOD Detection for Scientific AIBogdan Raonic, Siddhartha Mishra, Samuel LanthalerICLR 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on13
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image SynthesisPrafulla Dhariwal, Alexander Quinn NicholNeurIPS 2021 · 13,211 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Implicit ModelsJiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, Stefano ErmonICLR 2021 · 11,743 citations
- Consistency ModelsYang Song, Prafulla Dhariwal, Mark Chen, Ilya SutskeverICML 2023 · 1,720 citations
Related papers
- Uncertainty Quantification for Traffic Forecasting: A Unified ApproachWeizhu Qian, Dalin Zhang, Yan Zhao, Kai Zheng et al.ICDE 2023 · 27 citations
- Normalizing Flow Ensembles for Rich Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty ModelingLucas Berry, David MegerAAAI 2023 · 15 citations
- Hyperdimensional Uncertainty Quantification for Multimodal Uncertainty Fusion in Autonomous Vehicles PerceptionLuke Chen, Junyao Wang, Trier Mortlock, Pramod P. Khargonekar et al.CVPR 2025
- Uncertainty-Calibrated Diffusion for Reliable 3D Molecular Graph GenerationFang Wan, Jingxiang Qu, Yi LiuKDD 2026
- Fully Heteroscedastic Count Regression with Deep Double Poisson NetworksSpencer Young, Porter Jenkins, Longchao Da, Jeffrey Dotson et al.ICML 2025
