STAT: Skill-Targeted Adaptive Training
Yinghui He, Abhishek Panigrahi, Yong Lin, Sanjeev Arora
Abstract
Language models often show little to no improvement (i.e., “saturation”) when trained via vanilla supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on data similar to what they saw in their training set (e.g., MATH). We introduce a new fine-tuning strategy, STAT, to train such a student model by using the metacognition ability of a stronger large language model (LLM) as the teacher. The teacher uses the task dataset to create a list of skills needed for the task, and then labels each data point with its required skills (Didolkar et al., 2024). By monitoring the student’s answers, the teacher creates a Missing-Skill-Profile for the student, tracking how often they failed to apply each skill in their responses. We use this idea to build a modified training set in one of two ways. In STAT-Sel, the teacher uses an existing set of training examples but adaptively reweights them according to the Missing-Skill-Profile. In STAT-Syn, the teacher synthesizes additional examples involving missing skills. Across extensive experiments on Llama and Qwen models, our methods yield improvements of up to 7.5% on MATH, whereas SFT provides only limited gains. Furthermore, STAT enhances performance on out-of-distribution benchmarks (e.g., AIME24/25, AMC23, etc.) by an average of 4.6%. Crucially, we find that STAT is complementary to RL via GRPO (Shao et al., 2024): after the model is improved using STAT to address skill gaps, GRPO continues to add further gains. We conclude that skill-targeted adaptive training should broadly improve current training pipelines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c0fb4544-5354-4221-8563-9f83f7371f6cCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on23
- Scaling Data-Constrained Language ModelsNiklas Muennighoff, Alexander M. Rush, Boaz Barak, Teven Le Scao et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 475 citations
- LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction TuningMengzhou Xia, Sadhika Malladi, Suchin Gururangan, Sanjeev Arora et al.ICML 2024 · 460 citations
- DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model PretrainingSang Michael Xie, Hieu Pham, Xuanyi Dong, Nan Du et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 457 citations
- Data Selection for Language Models via Importance ResamplingSang Michael Xie, Shibani Santurkar, Tengyu Ma, Percy LiangNeurIPS 2023 · 383 citations
- When Scaling Meets LLM Finetuning: The Effect of Data, Model and Finetuning MethodBiao Zhang, Zhongtao Liu, Colin Cherry, Orhan FiratICLR 2024 · 271 citations
Related papers
- Quagmires in SFT-RL Post-Training: When High SFT Scores Mislead and What to Use InsteadFeiyang Kang, Michael Kuchnik, Karthik Padthe, Marin Vlastelica et al.ICLR 2026 · 27 citations
- ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-TuningLuong Quoc Trung, Xinbo Zhang, Zhanming Jie, Peng Sun et al.ACL 2024
- How Abilities in Large Language Models are Affected by Supervised Fine-tuning Data CompositionGuanting Dong, Hongyi Yuan, Keming Lu, Chengpeng Li et al.ACL 2024 · 39 citations
- Why Supervised Fine-Tuning Fails to Learn: A Systematic Study of Incomplete Learning in Large Language ModelsChao Xue, Yao Wang, Mengqiao Liu, Di Liang et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
- On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward RectificationYongliang Wu, Yizhou Zhou, Ziheng Zhou, Yingzhe Peng et al.ICLR 2026 · 130 citations
