Distillation Robustifies Unlearning
Bruce W. Lee, Addie Foote, Alex Infanger, Leni Shor, Harish Kamath, Jacob Goldman-Wetzler, Bryce Woodworth, Alex Cloud, Alexander Matt Turner
Abstract
Current LLM unlearning methods are not robust. A few steps of finetuning can revert their effects. We begin by showing that this is true even for an idealized form of unlearning: training to imitate a model that was never trained on unwanted information. This shows that training a model can drastically modify its input-output behavior while leaving its underlying capabilities intact. In light of this dynamic, we show our main result. Training a randomly initialized student on the outputs of an unlearned model transfers behaviors while leaving latent capabilities behind. In short, distillation robustifies unlearning. Based on this result, we propose Unlearn-Noise-Distill-on-Outputs (UNDO), a scalable method that distills an unlearned model into a noised copy of itself. UNDO introduces a tunable tradeoff between compute cost and robustness, establishing a new Pareto frontier on synthetic language and arithmetic tasks. At its strongest setting, UNDO matches the robustness of a model retrained from scratch with perfect data filtering while using only 60-80% of the compute and requiring only 0.01% of the pretraining data to be labeled. We also show that UNDO robustifies unlearning on the more realistic Weapons of Mass Destruction Proxy (WMDP) benchmark. Since distillation is widely used in practice, incorporating an unlearning step beforehand offers a convenient path to robust capability removal.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c0cec8e6-3159-47ce-802c-f1e85093dd49Cited by top-tier papers4
- Deep Ignorance: Filtering Pretraining Data Builds Tamper-Resistant Safeguards into Open-Weight LLMsKyle O'Brien, Stephen Casper, Quentin Anthony, Tomek Korbak et al.ICLR 2026 · 59 citations
- On the creation of narrow AI: hierarchy and nonlocality of neural network skillsEric J. Michaud, Asher Parker-Sartori, Max TegmarkNeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Dual-Space Smoothness for Robust and Balanced LLM UnlearningHan Yan, Zheyuan Liu, Meng JiangICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Modular Pretraining Enables Access ControlEthan Roland, Murat Cubuktepe, Erick Martinez, Stijn Servaes et al.ICML 2026
Builds on41
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Machine UnlearningLucas Bourtoule, Varun Chandrasekaran, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Hengrui Jia et al.S&P 2021 · 1,381 citations
- Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?Rylan Schaeffer, Brando Miranda, Sanmi KoyejoNeurIPS 2023 · 796 citations
- Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning ModelsChuan Guo, Tom Goldstein, Awni Y. Hannun, Laurens van der MaatenICML 2020 · 633 citations
Related papers
- DUET: Distilled LLM Unlearning from an Efficiently Contextualized TeacherYisheng Zhong, Zhengbang Yang, Zhuangdi ZhuICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Invariance Makes LLM Unlearning Resilient Even to Unanticipated Downstream Fine-TuningChangsheng Wang, Yihua Zhang, Jinghan Jia, Parikshit Ram et al.ICML 2025
- Elastic Robust Unlearning of Specific Knowledge in Large Language ModelsYize Sui, Jing Ren, Wenjing Yang, Ruochun Jin et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Reversing the Forget-Retain Objectives: An Efficient LLM Unlearning Framework from Logit DifferenceJiabao Ji, Yujian Liu, Yang Zhang, Gaowen Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 106 citations
- Attention Smoothing Is All You Need For UnlearningSaleh Zare Zade, Xiangyu Zhou, Sijia Liu, Dongxiao ZhuICLR 2026 · 7 citations
