AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Research
Renze Lou, Hanzi Xu, Sijia Wang, Jiangshu Du, Ryo Kamoi, Xiaoxin Lu, Jian Xie, Yuxuan Sun, Yusen Zhang, Jihyun Janice Ahn, Hongchao Fang, Zhuoyang Zou
Abstract
Numerous studies have assessed the proficiency of AI systems, particularly large language models (LLMs), in facilitating everyday tasks such as email writing, question answering, and creative content generation. However, researchers face unique challenges and opportunities in leveraging LLMs for their own work, such as brainstorming research ideas, designing experiments, and writing or reviewing papers. In this study, we introduce AAAR-1.0, a benchmark dataset designed to evaluate LLM performance in three fundamental, expertise-intensive research tasks: (i) EQUATIONINFERENCE, assessing the correctness of equations based on the contextual information in paper submissions; (ii) EXPERIMENTDESIGN, designing experiments to validate research ideas and solutions; and (iii) PAPERWEAKNESS, identifying weaknesses in paper submissions. AAAR-1.0 differs from prior benchmarks in two key ways: first, it is explicitly research-oriented, with tasks requiring deep domain expertise; second, it is researcher-oriented, mirroring the primary activities that researchers engage in on a daily basis. An evaluation of both open-source and proprietary LLMs reveals their potential as well as limitations in conducting sophisticated research tasks. We will release the AAAR-1.0 and keep iterating it to new versions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- MMMU: A Massive Multi-Discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIXiang Yue, Yuansheng Ni, Tianyu Zheng, Kai Zhang et al.CVPR 2024 · 213 citations
- MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning ExperimentationQian Huang, Jian Vora, Percy Liang, Jure LeskovecICML 2024 · 209 citations
- GeoLM: Empowering Language Models for Geospatially Grounded Language UnderstandingZekun Li, Wenxuan Zhou, Yao-Yi Chiang, Muhao ChenEMNLP 2023 · 25 citations
Related papers
- LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)ReviewingJiangshu Du, Yibo Wang, Wenting Zhao, Zhongfen Deng et al.EMNLP 2024 · 14 citations
- Evaluating LLM Reasoning in the Operations Research Domain with ORQAMahdi Mostajabdaveh, Timothy Tin Long Yu, Samarendra Chandan Bindu Dash, Rindra Ramamonjison et al.AAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- ARBench: Algorithmic Reasoner or API Alchemist? Evaluating LLMs Beyond API CallsRenbiao Liu, Chao-Zeng Ma, Anqi Li, Hui Sun et al.AAAI 2026
- SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language ModelsXiaoxuan Wang, Ziniu Hu, Pan Lu, Yanqiao Zhu et al.ICML 2024 · 220 citations
- The Ideation-Execution Gap: Execution Outcomes of LLM-Generated versus Human Research IdeasChenglei Si, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Diyi YangICLR 2026 · 60 citations
