Attitudes towards Client-Side Scanning for CSAM, Terrorism, Drug Trafficking, Drug Use and Tax Evasion in Germany
Lisa Geierhaas, Fabian Otto, Maximilian Häring, Matthew Smith
Abstract
In recent years, there have been a rising number of legislative efforts and proposed technical measures to weaken privacy-preserving technology, with the stated goal of countering serious crimes like child abuse. One of these proposed measures is Client-Side Scanning (CSS). CSS has been hotly debated both in the context of Apple stating their intention to deploy it in 2021 as well as EU legislation being proposed in 2022. Both sides of the argument state that they are working in the best interests of the people. To shed some light on this, we conducted a survey with a representative sample of German citizens. We investigated the general acceptance of CSS vs cloud-based scanning for different types of crimes and analyzed how trust in the German government and companies such as Google and Apple influenced our participants’ views. We found that, by and large, the majority of participants were willing to accept CSS measures to combat serious crimes such as child abuse or terrorism, but support dropped significantly for other illegal activities. However, the majority of participants who supported CSS were also worried about potential abuse, with only 20% stating that they were not concerned. These results suggest that many of our participants would be willing to have their devices scanned and accept some risks in the hope of aiding law enforcement. In our analysis, we argue that there are good reasons to not see this as a carte blanche for the introduction of CSS but as a call to action for the S&P community. More research is needed into how a population’s desire to prevent serious crime online can be achieved while mitigating the risks to privacy and society.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get c0028675-c481-4b10-bd9b-17a4ecb1143cCited by top-tier papers3
- Users' Perceptions of Online Child Abuse Detection MechanismsElmira Deldari, Parth Kirankumar Thakkar, Yaxing YaoCSCW 2024 · 6 citations
- Mental Models, Expectations and Implications of Client-Side Scanning: An Interview Study with ExpertsDivyanshu Bhardwaj, Carolyn Guthoff, Adrian Dabrowski, Sascha Fahl et al.CHI 2024 · 5 citations
- Prevalence Overshadows Concerns? Understanding Chinese Users' Privacy Awareness and Expectations Towards LLM-Based Healthcare ConsultationZhihuang Liu, Ling Hu, Tongqing Zhou, Yonghao Tang et al.S&P 2025
Related papers
- "Not the Right Question?" A Study on Attitudes Toward Client-Side Scanning with Security and Privacy Researchers and a U.S. Population SampleLisa Geierhaas, Florin Martius, Arthi Arumugam, Matthew SmithS&P 2025
- Deep perceptual hashing algorithms with hidden dual purpose: when client-side scanning does facial recognitionShubham Jain, Ana-Maria Cretu, Antoine Cully, Yves-Alexandre de MontjoyeS&P 2023
- Where Are the Red Lines? Towards Ethical Server-Side Scans in Security and Privacy ResearchFlorian Hantke, Sebastian Roth, Rafael Mrowczynski, Christine Utz et al.S&P 2024 · 17 citations
- Experimental Analyses of the Physical Surveillance Risks in Client-Side Content ScanningAshish Hooda, Andrey Labunets, Tadayoshi Kohno, Earlence FernandesNDSS 2024
- Public Verification for Private Hash MatchingSarah Scheffler, Anunay Kulshrestha, Jonathan R. MayerS&P 2023
