Experimental Analyses of the Physical Surveillance Risks in Client-Side Content Scanning
Ashish Hooda, Andrey Labunets, Tadayoshi Kohno, Earlence Fernandes
Abstract
— Content scanning systems employ perceptual hashing algorithms to scan user content for illicit material, such as child pornography or terrorist recruitment flyers. Perceptual hashing algorithms help determine whether two images are visually similar while preserving the privacy of the input images. Several efforts from industry and academia propose scanning on client devices such as smartphones due to the impending rollout of end-to-end encryption that will make server-side scanning difficult. These proposals have met with strong criticism because of the potential for the technology to be misused for censorship. However, the risks of this technology in the context of surveillance are not well understood. Our work informs this conversation by experimentally characterizing the potential for one type of misuse — attackers manipulating the content scanning system to perform physical surveillance on target locations. Our contributions are threefold: (1) we offer a definition of physical surveillance in the context of client-side image scanning systems; (2) we experimentally characterize this risk and create a surveillance algorithm that achieves physical surveillance rates more than 30% by poisoning 0.2% of the perceptual hash database; (3) we experimentally study the trade-off between the robustness of client-side image scanning systems and surveillance, showing that more robust detection of illicit material leads to an increased potential for physical surveillance in most settings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4939cfc6-4375-414a-8167-4ec0bcae5663Builds on12
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Trojaning Attack on Neural NetworksYingqi Liu, Shiqing Ma, Yousra Aafer, Wen-Chuan Lee et al.NDSS 2018 · 1,377 citations
- Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential PrivacyMathias Lécuyer, Vaggelis Atlidakis, Roxana Geambasu, Daniel Hsu et al.S&P 2019 · 1,022 citations
- Hidden Trigger Backdoor AttacksAniruddha Saha, Akshayvarun Subramanya, Hamed PirsiavashAAAI 2020 · 743 citations
- Diffusion Models for Adversarial PurificationWeili Nie, Brandon Guo, Yujia Huang, Chaowei Xiao et al.ICML 2022 · 663 citations
Related papers
- Adversarial Detection Avoidance Attacks: Evaluating the robustness of perceptual hashing-based client-side scanningShubham Jain, Ana-Maria Cretu, Yves-Alexandre de MontjoyeUSENIX Security 2022
- Deep perceptual hashing algorithms with hidden dual purpose: when client-side scanning does facial recognitionShubham Jain, Ana-Maria Cretu, Antoine Cully, Yves-Alexandre de MontjoyeS&P 2023
- Squint Hard Enough: Attacking Perceptual Hashing with Adversarial Machine LearningJonathan Prokos, Neil Fendley, Matthew Green, Roei Schuster et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Identifying Harmful Media in End-to-End Encrypted Communication: Efficient Private Membership ComputationAnunay Kulshrestha, Jonathan R. MayerUSENIX Security 2021 · 50 citations
- CertPHash: Towards Certified Perceptual Hashing via Robust TrainingYuchen Yang, Qichang Liu, Christopher Brix, Huan Zhang et al.USENIX Security 2025
