Speculative Streaming: Efficient and Scalable Speculative Decoding with Multi-Stream Attention
Nikhil Bhendawade, Irina Belousova, Qichen Fu, Henry Mason, Antonie Lin, Mohammad Rastegari, Mahyar Najibi
Abstract
Speculative decoding is a prominent technique for accelerating LLM inference by leveraging an auxiliary draft model, but its effectiveness is limited by the autoregressive nature of draft generation, where acceptance rates depend on the draft model's size. Scaling the draft model improves acceptance but also increases speculation latency, limiting overall speedup. Furthermore, fine-tuning both the draft and target models is often necessary to achieve high acceptance rates, adding complexity to inference systems as the number of downstream tasks grows. Single-model approaches like Medusa generate speculative tokens non-autoregressively but lack token dependencies, limiting effectiveness. Alternatives like Hydra and Eagle incorporate token dependencies but rely on dedicated heads, making speculation independent of the base model and limiting the extent to which stronger base models can improve speculation. We introduce a novel speculative decoding method that integrates speculative draft generation directly within the target model using multi-stream attention. This improves acceptance rates by introducing interdependencies between speculative tokens while ensuring non-autoregressive draft generation with minimal overhead. As target models scale in size and quality, speculative generation improves naturally with our method, unlike prior approaches. Furthermore, our approach is parameter-efficient, requiring over 1000× fewer additional parameters than Medusa, making it highly suitable for resource-constrained devices. We design our method to operate in two modes: (1) Lossless mode, a plug-and-play method that preserves the output of any pretrained model; and (2) Shared mode, optimizing both speedup and downstream output quality. We demonstrate a 2-3.5× speedup across diverse tasks, including summarization, translation, question answering, mathematical reason-* Work done while at Apple.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bfe991c1-aa50-4cd1-945c-7e04f6499c77Builds on8
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative DecodingYaniv Leviathan, Matan Kalman, Yossi MatiasICML 2023 · 1,472 citations
- SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can be Accurately Pruned in One-ShotElias Frantar, Dan AlistarhICML 2023 · 1,240 citations
- ZeroQuant: Efficient and Affordable Post-Training Quantization for Large-Scale TransformersZhewei Yao, Reza Yazdani Aminabadi, Minjia Zhang, Xiaoxia Wu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 816 citations
- EAGLE: Speculative Sampling Requires Rethinking Feature UncertaintyYuhui Li, Fangyun Wei, Chao Zhang, Hongyang ZhangICML 2024 · 424 citations
Related papers
- Medusa: Simple LLM Inference Acceleration Framework with Multiple Decoding HeadsTianle Cai, Yuhong Li, Zhengyang Geng, Hongwu Peng et al.ICML 2024 · 669 citations
- Alignment-Augmented Speculative Decoding with Alignment Sampling and Conditional VerificationJikai Wang, Zhenxu Tian, Juntao Li, Qingrong Xia et al.EMNLP 2025
- ConFu: Contemplate the Future for Better Speculative SamplingZongyue Qin, Raghavv Goel, Mukul Gagrani, Risheek Garrepalli et al.ICML 2026
- Not-a-Bandit: Provably No-Regret Drafter Selection in Speculative Decoding for LLMsHongyi Liu, Jiaji Huang, Zhen Jia, Youngsuk Park et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Training-Free Loosely Speculative Decoding: Accepting Semantically Correct Drafts Beyond Exact MatchJinze Li, Yixing Xu, Guanchen Li, Shuo Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 12 citations
