A Unified Perspective on Adversarial Membership Manipulation in Vision Models
RUIZE GAO, Kaiwen Zhou, Yongqiang Chen, Feng Liu
Abstract
Membership inference attacks (MIAs) aim to determine whether a specific data point was part of a model’s training set, serving as effective tools for evaluating privacy leakage of vision models. However, existing MIAs implicitly assume honest query inputs, and their adversarial robustness remains unexplored. We show that MIAs for vision models expose a previously overlooked adversarial surface: adversarial membership manipulation, where imperceptible perturbations can reliably push non-member images into the “member’’ region of state-of-the-art MIAs. In this paper, we provide the first unified perspective on this phenomenon by analyzing its mechanism and implications. We begin by demonstrating that adversarial membership fabrication is consistently effective across diverse architectures and datasets. We then reveal a distinctive geometric signature—a characteristic gradient-norm collapse trajectory—that reliably separates fabricated from true members despite their nearly identical semantic representations. Building on this insight, we introduce a principled detection strategy grounded in gradient-geometry signals and develop a robust inference framework that substantially mitigates adversarial manipulation. Extensive experiments show that fabrication is broadly effective, while our detection and robust inference strategies significantly enhance resilience. This work establishes the first comprehensive framework for adversarial membership manipulation in vision models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on14
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
- Label-Only Membership Inference AttacksChristopher A. Choquette-Choo, Florian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Nicolas PapernotICML 2021 · 628 citations
Related papers
- Privacy Leaks by Adversaries: Adversarial Iterations for Membership Inference AttackJing Xue, Zhishen Sun, Haishan Ye, Luo Luo et al.AAAI 2026
- Mixup Training for Generative Models to Defend Membership Inference AttacksZhe Ji, Qiansiqi Hu, Liyao Xiang, Chenghu ZhouINFOCOM 2023 · 3 citations
- Leveraging Adversarial Examples to Quantify Membership Information LeakageGanesh Del Grosso, Hamid Jalalzai, Georg Pichler, Catuscia Palamidessi et al.CVPR 2022 · 2 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks against Vision Transformers: Mosaic MixUp Training to the DefenseQiankun Zhang, Di Yuan, Boyu Zhang, Bin Yuan et al.CCS 2024 · 1 citation
- Membership Inference Attacks by Exploiting Loss TrajectoryYiyong Liu, Zhengyu Zhao, Michael Backes, Yang ZhangCCS 2022 · 79 citations
