On the Robustness of Transformers against Context Hijacking for Linear Classification
Tianle Li, Chenyang Zhang, Xingwu Chen, Yuan Cao, Difan Zou
Abstract
Transformer-based Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated powerful in-context learning capabilities. However, their predictions can be disrupted by factually correct context, a phenomenon known as context hijacking, revealing a significant robustness issue. To understand this phenomenon theoretically, we explore an in-context linear classification problem based on recent advances in linear transformers. In our setup, context tokens are designed as factually correct query-answer pairs, where the queries are similar to the final query but have opposite labels. Then, we develop a general theoretical analysis on the robustness of the linear transformers, which is formulated as a function of the model depth, training context lengths, and number of hijacking context tokens. A key finding is that a well-trained deeper transformer can achieve higher robustness, which aligns with empirical observations. We show that this improvement arises because deeper layers enable more fine-grained optimization steps, effectively mitigating interference from context hijacking. This is also well supported by our numerical and real-world experiments. Our findings provide theoretical insights into the benefits of deeper architectures and contribute to enhancing the understanding of transformer architectures.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bf66b897-4853-4655-8c16-a9744128233cCited by top-tier papers7
- BAM-ICL: Causal Hijacking In-Context Learning with Budgeted Adversarial ManipulationRui Chu, Bingyin Zhao, Hanling Jiang, Shuchin Aeron et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- How Can Mamba Learn In Context with Outliers and Generalize Provably?Hongkang Li, Songtao Lu, Xiaodong Cui, Pin-Yu Chen et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Adversarially Pretrained Transformers May Be Universally Robust In-Context LearnersSoichiro Kumano, Hiroshi Kera, Toshihiko YamasakiICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Transformers Efficiently Perform In-Context Logistic Regression via Normalized Gradient DescentChenyang Zhang, Yuan CaoICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Understanding and Improving Continuous LLM Adversarial Training via In-context Learning TheoryShaopeng Fu, Di WangICLR 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on51
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian InferenceSang Michael Xie, Aditi Raghunathan, Percy Liang, Tengyu MaICLR 2022 · 1,030 citations
- Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant ContextFreda Shi, Xinyun Chen, Kanishka Misra, Nathan Scales et al.ICML 2023 · 970 citations
Related papers
- Why Larger Language Models Do In-context Learning Differently?Zhenmei Shi, Junyi Wei, Zhuoyan Xu, Yingyu LiangICML 2024 · 54 citations
- How Do Transformers Learn In-Context Beyond Simple Functions? A Case Study on Learning with RepresentationsTianyu Guo, Wei Hu, Song Mei, Huan Wang et al.ICLR 2024 · 80 citations
- How Do Nonlinear Transformers Learn and Generalize in In-Context Learning?Hongkang Li, Meng Wang, Songtao Lu, Xiaodong Cui et al.ICML 2024 · 37 citations
- Short-length Adversarial Training Helps LLMs Defend Long-length Jailbreak Attacks: Theoretical and Empirical EvidenceShaopeng Fu, Liang Ding, Jingfeng Zhang, Di WangNeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
- Fine-Tuning Without Forgetting In-Context Learning: A Theoretical Analysis of Linear Attention ModelsChungpa Lee, Jy-yong Sohn, Kangwook LeeICML 2026 · 1 citation
