Advancing Machine-Generated Text Detection from an Easy to Hard Supervision Perspective
Chenwang Wu, Yiu-ming Cheung, Bo Han, Defu Lian
Abstract
Existing machine-generated text (MGT) detection methods implicitly assume labels as the "golden standard". However, we reveal boundary ambiguity in MGT detection, implying that traditional training paradigms are inexact. Moreover, limitations of human cognition and the superintelligence of detectors make inexact learning widespread and inevitable. To this end, we propose an easy-to-hard enhancement framework to provide reliable supervision under such inexact conditions. Distinct from knowledge distillation, our framework employs an easy supervisor targeting relatively simple longer-text detection tasks (despite weaker capabilities), to enhance the more challenging target detector. Firstly, longer texts targeted by supervisors theoretically alleviate the impact of inexact labels, laying the foundation for reliable supervision. Secondly, by structurally incorporating the detector into the supervisor, we theoretically model the supervisor as a lower performance bound for the detector. Thus, optimizing the supervisor indirectly optimizes the detector, ultimately approximating the underlying "golden" labels. Extensive experiments across diverse practical scenarios, including cross-LLM, cross-domain, mixed text, and paraphrase attacks, demonstrate the framework's significant detection effectiveness. The code is available at: https://github.com/tmlr-group/Easy2Hard .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bf3e54f8-f3ad-4aee-a153-babe5decc64eBuilds on29
- Sharpness-aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving GeneralizationPierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, Hossein Mobahi, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 1,861 citations
- DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICML 2023 · 988 citations
- A Watermark for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz et al.ICML 2023 · 854 citations
- Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defenseKalpesh Krishna, Yixiao Song, Marzena Karpinska, John Wieting et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 657 citations
- RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial LearningXiaomeng Hu, Pin-Yu Chen, Tsung-Yi HoNeurIPS 2023 · 315 citations
Related papers
- DetectAnyLLM: Towards Generalizable and Robust Detection of Machine-Generated Text Across Domains and ModelsJiachen Fu, Chun-Le Guo, Chongyi LiACM MM 2025 · 4 citations
- Beyond Raw Detection Scores: Markov-Informed Calibration for Boosting Machine-Generated Text DetectionChenwang Wu, Yiu-ming Cheung, Shuhai Zhang, Bo Han et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- HLD: Approximate Hierarchical Linguistic Distribution Modeling for LLM-Generated Text DetectionRui Guo, Weibin Zeng, Fuzhang Wu, Yan Kong et al.ICLR 2026
- MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the WildYafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi et al.ACL 2024 · 44 citations
- AI 'News' Content Farms Are Easy to Make and Hard to Detect: A Case Study in ItalianGiovanni Puccetti, Anna Rogers, Chiara Alzetta, Felice Dell'Orletta et al.ACL 2024 · 1 citation
