Lune

ACL Findings2025

MOSAIC: Multiple Observers Spotting AI Content

Matthieu Dubois, François Yvon, Pablo Piantanida

Abstract

The dissemination of Large Language Models (LLMs), trained at scale, and endowed with powerful text-generating abilities, has made it easier for all to produce harmful, toxic, faked or forged content. In response, various proposals have been made to automatically discriminate artificially generated from human-written texts, typically framing the problem as a binary classification problem. Early approaches evaluate an input document with a well-chosen detector LLM, assuming that low-perplexity scores reliably signal machine-made content. More recent systems instead consider two LLMs and compare their probability distributions over the document to further discriminate when perplexity alone cannot. However, using a fixed pair of models can induce brittleness in performance. We extend these approaches to the ensembling of several LLMs and derive a new, theoretically grounded approach to combine their respective strengths. Our experiments, conducted with various generator LLMs, indicate that this approach effectively leverages the strengths of each model, resulting in robust detection performance across multiple domains.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 1 top-tier paper that cites it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers1

  1. DMAP: A Distribution Map for TextTom Kempton, Julia Rozanova, Parameswaran Kamalaruban, Maeve Madigan et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation

Builds on18

  1. The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
  2. DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICML 2023 · 988 citations
  3. A Watermark for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz et al.ICML 2023 · 854 citations
  4. Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at ScaleAlexis Conneau, Kartikay Khandelwal, Naman Goyal, Vishrav Chaudhary et al.ACL 2020 · 539 citations
  5. Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability CurvatureGuangsheng Bao, Yanbin Zhao, Zhiyang Teng, Linyi Yang et al.ICLR 2024 · 311 citations

Related papers

  1. On the Zero-Shot Generalization of Machine-Generated Text DetectorsXiao Pu, Jingyu Zhang, Xiaochuang Han, Yulia Tsvetkov et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 14 citations
  2. MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the WildYafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi et al.ACL 2024 · 44 citations
  3. Enhancing LLM Text Detection with Retrieved Contexts and Logits Distribution ConsistencyZhaoheng Huang, Yutao Zhu, Ji-Rong Wen, Zhicheng DouEMNLP 2025
  4. Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated TextAbhimanyu Hans, Avi Schwarzschild, Valeriia Cherepanova, Hamid Kazemi et al.ICML 2024 · 262 citations
  5. LLMDet: A Third Party Large Language Models Generated Text Detection ToolKangxi Wu, Liang Pang, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 31 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines