SYMBEXCEL: Automated Analysis and Understanding of Malicious Excel 4.0 Macros
Nicola Ruaro, Fabio Pagani, Stefano Ortolani, Christopher Kruegel, Giovanni Vigna
Abstract
Malicious software (malware) poses a significant threat to the security of our networks and users. In the ever-evolving malware landscape, Excel 4.0 Office macros (XL4) have recently become an important attack vector. These macros are often hidden within apparently legitimate documents and under several layers of obfuscation. As such, they are difficult to analyze using static analysis techniques. Moreover, the analysis in a dynamic analysis environment (a sandbox) is challenging because the macros execute correctly only under specific environmental conditions that are not always easy to create. This paper presents SYMBEXCEL, a novel solution that leverages symbolic execution to deobfuscate and analyze Excel 4.0 macros automatically. Our approach proceeds in three stages: (1) The malicious document is parsed and loaded in memory; (2) Our symbolic execution engine executes the XL4 formulas; and (3) Our Engine concretizes any symbolic values encountered during the symbolic exploration, therefore evaluating the execution of each macro under a broad range of (meaningful) environment configurations. SYMBEXCEL significantly outperforms existing deobfuscation tools, allowing us to reliably extract Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) and other critical forensics information. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, especially in deobfuscating novel malicious documents that make heavy use of environment variables and are often not identified by commercial anti-virus software.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on9
- Understanding Linux MalwareEmanuele Cozzi, Mariano Graziano, Yanick Fratantonio, Davide BalzarottiS&P 2018 · 203 citations
- FirmUSB: Vetting USB Device Firmware using Domain Informed Symbolic ExecutionGrant Hernandez, Farhaan Fowze, Dave (Jing) Tian, Tuba Yavuz et al.CCS 2017 · 98 citations
- Towards Paving the Way for Large-Scale Windows Malware Analysis: Generic Binary Unpacking with Orders-of-Magnitude Performance BoostBinlin Cheng, Jiang Ming, Jianming Fu, Guojun Peng et al.CCS 2018 · 68 citations
- Forecasting Malware Capabilities From Cyber Attack Memory ImagesOmar Alrawi, Moses Ike, Matthew Pruett, Ranjita Pai Kasturi et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 32 citations
- Prevalence and Impact of Low-Entropy Packing Schemes in the Malware EcosystemAlessandro Mantovani, Simone Aonzo, Xabier Ugarte-Pedrero, Alessio Merlo et al.NDSS 2020
Related papers
- Cryptographic Function Detection in Obfuscated Binaries via Bit-Precise Symbolic Loop MappingDongpeng Xu, Jiang Ming, Dinghao WuS&P 2017 · 83 citations
- Be Careful of What You Embed: Demystifying OLE VulnerabilitiesYunpeng Tian, Feng Dong, Haoyi Liu, Meng Xu et al.NDSS 2025
- Spotless Sandboxes: Evading Malware Analysis Systems Using Wear-and-Tear ArtifactsNajmeh Miramirkhani, Mahathi Priya Appini, Nick Nikiforakis, Michalis PolychronakisS&P 2017 · 134 citations
- SymGX: Detecting Cross-boundary Pointer Vulnerabilities of SGX Applications via Static Symbolic ExecutionYuanpeng Wang, Ziqi Zhang, Ningyu He, Zhineng Zhong et al.CCS 2023 · 8 citations
- SymQEMU: Compilation-based symbolic execution for binariesSebastian Poeplau, Aurélien FrancillonNDSS 2021
