Keep it Short: A Comparison of Voice Assistants' Response Behavior
Gabriel Haas, Michael Rietzler, Matt Jones, Enrico Rukzio
Abstract
Voice assistants (VAs) are present in homes, smartphones, and cars. They allow users to perform tasks without graphical or tactile user interfaces, as they are designed for natural language interaction. However, we found that currently, VAs are emulating human behavior by responding in complete sentences, limiting the design options, and preventing VAs from meeting their full potential as a utilitarian tool. We implemented a VA that handles requests in three response styles: two differing short keyword-based response styles and a full-sentence baseline. In a user study, 72 participants interacted with our VA by issuing eight requests. Results show that the short responses were perceived similarly useful and likable while being perceived as more efficient, especially for commands, and sometimes better to comprehend than the baseline. To achieve widespread adoption, we argue that VAs should be customizable and adapt to users instead of always responding in full sentences.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get bf18f2f5-54f4-45fc-92ef-49a26591035bCited by top-tier papers6
- Voice Assistants for Health Self-Management: Designing for and with Older AdultsAmama Mahmood, Shiye Cao, Maia Stiber, Victor Nikhil Antony et al.CHI 2025 · 30 citations
- Designing for Harm Reduction: Communication Repair for Multicultural Users' Voice InteractionsKimi Wenzel, Geoff KaufmanCHI 2024 · 17 citations
- Designing Accessible Audio Nudges for Voice InterfacesHira Jamshed, Novia Nurain, Robin N. BrewerCHI 2025 · 8 citations
- Gesture and Audio-Haptic Guidance Techniques to Direct Conversations with Intelligent Voice InterfacesShwetha Rajaram, Hemant Bhaskar Surale, Codie McConkey, Carine Rognon et al.CHI 2025 · 5 citations
- "Mango Mango, How to Let The Lettuce Dry Without A Spinner?": Exploring User Perceptions of Using An LLM-Based Conversational Assistant Toward Cooking PartnerSzeyi Chan, Jiachen Li, Bingsheng Yao, Amama Mahmood et al.CSCW 2025 · 4 citations
Related papers
- Eliciting and Analysing Users' Envisioned Dialogues with Perfect Voice AssistantsSarah Theres Völkel, Daniel Buschek, Malin Eiband, Benjamin R. Cowan et al.CHI 2021 · 75 citations
- Like My Aunt Dorothy: Effects of Conversational Styles on Perceptions, Acceptance and Metaphorical Descriptions of Voice Assistants during Later AdulthoodJessie Chin, Smit Desai, Sheny (cheng-Hsuan) Lin, Shannon MejíaCSCW 2024 · 28 citations
- Better to Ask Than Assume: Proactive Voice Assistants' Communication Strategies That Respect User Agency in a Smart Home EnvironmentJeesun Oh, Wooseok Kim, Sungbae Kim, Hyeonjeong Im et al.CHI 2024 · 22 citations
- "Nobody Speaks that Fast!" An Empirical Study of Speech Rate in Conversational Agents for People with Vision ImpairmentsDasom Choi, Daehyun Kwak, Minji Cho, Sangsu LeeCHI 2020 · 55 citations
- "Hi! I am the Crowd Tasker" Crowdsourcing through Digital Voice AssistantsDanula Hettiachchi, Zhanna Sarsenbayeva, Fraser Allison, Niels van Berkel et al.CHI 2020 · 22 citations
