Explaining Adversarial Robustness of Neural Networks from Clustering Effect Perspective
Yulin Jin, Xiaoyu Zhang, Jian Lou, Xu Ma, Zilong Wang, Xiaofeng Chen
Abstract
Adversarial training (AT) is the most commonly used mechanism to improve the robustness of deep neural networks. Recently, a novel adversarial attack against intermediate layers exploits the extra fragility of adversarially trained networks to output incorrect predictions. The result implies the insufficiency in the searching space of the adversarial perturbation in adversarial training. To straighten out the reason for the effectiveness of the intermediate-layer attack, we interpret the forward propagation as the Clustering Effect, characterizing that the intermediate-layer representations of neural networks for samples i.i.d. to the training set with the same label are similar, and we theoretically prove the existence of Clustering Effect by corresponding Information Bottleneck Theory. We afterward observe that the intermediate-layer attack disobeys the clustering effect of the AT-trained model. Inspired by these significant observations, we propose a regularization method to extend the perturbation searching space during training, named sufficient adversarial training (SAT). We give a proven robustness bound of neural networks through rigorous mathematical proof. The experimental evaluations manifest the superiority of SAT over other state-of-the-art AT mechanisms in defending against adversarial attacks against both output and intermediate layers. Our code and Appendix can be found at https://github.com/ clustering-effect/SAT.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bd2dd738-e0b5-4f10-9c1e-0ebf7192879aCited by top-tier papers2
- SEBA: Sample-Efficient Black-Box Attacks on Visual Reinforcement LearningTairan Huang, Yulin Jin, Junxu Liu, Qingqing Ye et al.CVPR 2026
- Class-feature Watermark: A Resilient Black-box Watermark Against Model Extraction AttacksYaxin Xiao, Qingqing Ye, Zi Liang, Haoyang Li et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on16
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Adversarial Weight Perturbation Helps Robust GeneralizationDongxian Wu, Shu-Tao Xia, Yisen WangNeurIPS 2020 · 917 citations
- Improving Adversarial Robustness Requires Revisiting Misclassified ExamplesYisen Wang, Difan Zou, Jinfeng Yi, James Bailey et al.ICLR 2020 · 829 citations
- Better Diffusion Models Further Improve Adversarial TrainingZekai Wang, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du, Min Lin et al.ICML 2023 · 300 citations
Related papers
- Adversarial Learning for Robust Deep ClusteringXu Yang, Cheng Deng, Kun Wei, Junchi Yan et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 77 citations
- Towards Better Robust Generalization with Shift Consistency RegularizationShufei Zhang, Zhuang Qian, Kaizhu Huang, Qiufeng Wang et al.ICML 2021 · 18 citations
- Understanding and Increasing Efficiency of Frank-Wolfe Adversarial TrainingTheodoros Tsiligkaridis, Jay RobertsCVPR 2022 · 6 citations
- Advancing Example Exploitation Can Alleviate Critical Challenges in Adversarial TrainingYao Ge, Yun Li, Keji Han, Junyi Zhu et al.ICCV 2023 · 6 citations
- Improving Adversarial Robustness by Putting More Regularizations on Less Robust SamplesDongyoon Yang, Insung Kong, Yongdai KimICML 2023 · 15 citations
