Lune

ICLR2025Top-tier venue

Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists From Generative AI

Robert Hönig, Javier Rando, Nicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr

2025Year
25Top-tier citations

Abstract

Artists are increasingly concerned about advancements in image generation models that can closely replicate their unique artistic styles. In response, several protection tools against style mimicry have been developed that incorporate small adversarial perturbations into artworks published online. In this work, we evaluate the effectiveness of popular protections-with millions of downloads-and show they only provide a false sense of security. We find that low-effort and "off-the-shelf" techniques, such as image upscaling, are sufficient to create robust mimicry methods that significantly degrade existing protections. Through a user study, we demonstrate that all existing protections can be easily bypassed, leaving artists vulnerable to style mimicry. We caution that tools based on adversarial perturbations cannot reliably protect artists from the misuse of generative AI, and urge the development of alternative protective solutions.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext bcfb7bcb-c6b6-4abd-82dd-10f247296db3

Cited by top-tier papers25

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on15

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines