Fair Adaptive Experiments
Waverly Wei, Xinwei Ma, Jingshen Wang
Abstract
Randomized experiments have been the gold standard for assessing the effectiveness of a treatment, policy, or intervention, spanning various fields, including social sciences, biomedical studies, and e-commerce. The classical complete randomization approach assigns treatments based on a pre-specified probability and may lead to inefficient use of data. Adaptive experiments improve upon complete randomization by sequentially learning and updating treatment assignment probabilities using accrued evidence during the experiment. Hence, they can help achieve efficient data use and higher estimation efficiency. However, their application can also raise fairness and equity concerns, as assignment probabilities may vary drastically across groups of participants. Furthermore, when treatment is expected to be extremely beneficial to certain groups of participants, it is more appropriate to expose many of these participants to favorable treatment. In response to these challenges, we propose a fair adaptive experiment strategy that simultaneously enhances data use efficiency, achieves an "envy-free" treatment assignment guarantee, and improves the overall welfare of participants. An important feature of our proposed strategy is that we do not impose parametric modeling assumptions on the outcome variables, making it more versatile and applicable to a wider array of applications. Through our theoretical investigation, we characterize the convergence rate of the estimated treatment effects and the associated standard deviations at the group level and further prove that our adaptive treatment assignment algorithm, despite not having a closed-form expression, approaches the optimal allocation rule asymptotically. Our proof strategy takes into account the fact that the allocation decisions in our design depend on sequentially accumulated data, which poses a significant challenge in characterizing the properties and conducting statistical inference of our method. We further provide simulation evidence and two synthetic data studies (in the Supplementary Materials) to showcase the performance of our fair adaptive experiment strategy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bc20cf23-e240-4edd-b8c5-db159d2a7b0cCited by top-tier papers5
- Honor Among Bandits: No-Regret Learning for Online Fair DivisionAriel D. Procaccia, Ben Schiffer, Shirley ZhangNeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
- Improved Regret Bounds for Online Fair Division with Bandit LearningBenjamin Schiffer, Shirley ZhangAAAI 2025 · 5 citations
- Using Surrogates in Covariate-adjusted Response-adaptive Randomization Experiments with Delayed OutcomesLei Shi, Waverly Wei, Jingshen WangNeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- FraPPE: Fast and Efficient Preference-Based Pure ExplorationUdvas Das, Apurv Shukla, Debabrota BasuNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Designing Time Series Experiments in A/B Testing with Transformer Reinforcement LearningXiangkun Wu, Qianglin Wen, Yingying Zhang, Hongtu Zhu et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on3
- Achieving Fairness in the Stochastic Multi-Armed Bandit ProblemVishakha Patil, Ganesh Ghalme, Vineet Nair, Y. NarahariAAAI 2020 · 131 citations
- Designing Fairly Fair Classifiers Via Economic Fairness NotionsSafwan Hossain, Andjela Mladenovic, Nisarg ShahWWW 2020 · 30 citations
- Non-stationary A/B TestsYuhang Wu, Zeyu Zheng, Guangyu Zhang, Zuohua Zhang et al.KDD 2022 · 5 citations
Related papers
- Active Adaptive Experimental Design for Treatment Effect Estimation with Covariate ChoiceMasahiro Kato, Akihiro Oga, Wataru Komatsubara, Ryo InokuchiICML 2024 · 12 citations
- Efficient Adaptive Experimentation with NoncomplianceMiruna Oprescu, Brian Cho, Nathan KallusNeurIPS 2025
- Privacy Preserving Adaptive Experiment DesignJiachun Li, Kaining Shi, David Simchi-LeviICML 2024 · 1 citation
- Beyond the Average: Distributional Causal Inference under Imperfect ComplianceUndral Byambadalai, Tomu Hirata, Tatsushi Oka, Shota YasuiNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Adaptive Instrument Design for Indirect ExperimentsYash Chandak, Shiv Shankar, Vasilis Syrgkanis, Emma BrunskillICLR 2024 · 5 citations
