Adaptive Instrument Design for Indirect Experiments
Yash Chandak, Shiv Shankar, Vasilis Syrgkanis, Emma Brunskill
Abstract
Indirect experiments provide a valuable framework for estimating treatment effects in situations where conducting randomized control trials (RCTs) is impractical or unethical. Unlike RCTs, indirect experiments estimate treatment effects by leveraging (conditional) instrumental variables, enabling estimation through encouragement and recommendation rather than strict treatment assignment. However, the sample efficiency of such estimators depends not only on the inherent variability in outcomes but also on the varying compliance levels of users with the instrumental variables and the choice of estimator being used, especially when dealing with numerous instrumental variables. While adaptive experiment design has a rich literature for direct experiments, in this paper we take the initial steps towards enhancing sample efficiency for indirect experiments by adaptively designing a data collection policy over instrumental variables. Our main contribution is a practical computational procedure that utilizes influence functions to search for an optimal data collection policy, minimizing the mean-squared error of the desired (non-linear) estimator. Through experiments conducted in various domains inspired by real-world applications, we showcase how our method can significantly improve the sample efficiency of indirect experiments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 14ddb398-6aef-45c3-92ce-e929e58decc2Cited by top-tier papers4
- Active Statistical InferenceTijana Zrnic, Emmanuel J. CandèsICML 2024 · 34 citations
- Targeted Sequential Indirect Experiment DesignElisabeth Ailer, Niclas Dern, Jason S. Hartford, Niki KilbertusNeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- Efficient Adaptive Experimentation with NoncomplianceMiruna Oprescu, Brian Cho, Nathan KallusNeurIPS 2025
- Learning Representations of Instruments for Partial Identification of Treatment EffectsJonas Schweisthal, Dennis Frauen, Maresa Schröder, Konstantin Hess et al.ICML 2025
Builds on12
- If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?Juhan Bae, Nathan Ng, Alston Lo, Marzyeh Ghassemi et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 185 citations
- VarGrad: A Low-Variance Gradient Estimator for Variational InferenceLorenz Richter, Ayman Boustati, Nikolas Nüsken, Francisco J. R. Ruiz et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 90 citations
- Learning Deep Features in Instrumental Variable RegressionLiyuan Xu, Yutian Chen, Siddarth Srinivasan, Nando de Freitas et al.ICLR 2021 · 85 citations
- Statistical Inference with M-Estimators on Adaptively Collected DataKelly W. Zhang, Lucas Janson, Susan A. MurphyNeurIPS 2021 · 66 citations
- Discriminative Jackknife: Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Learning via Higher-Order Influence FunctionsAhmed M. Alaa, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2020 · 59 citations
Related papers
- Adaptive Data-Borrowing for Improving Treatment Effect Estimation using External ControlsQinwei Yang, Jingyi Li, Peng WuNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- A Non-parametric Direct Learning Approach to Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation under Unmeasured ConfoundingXinhai Zhang, Xingye QiaoNeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation
- Beyond the Average: Distributional Causal Inference under Imperfect ComplianceUndral Byambadalai, Tomu Hirata, Tatsushi Oka, Shota YasuiNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Adaptive Experimentation When You Can't ExperimentYao Zhao, Kwang-Sung Jun, Tanner Fiez, Lalit JainNeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- Active Adaptive Experimental Design for Treatment Effect Estimation with Covariate ChoiceMasahiro Kato, Akihiro Oga, Wataru Komatsubara, Ryo InokuchiICML 2024 · 12 citations
