Eliciting Harmful Capabilities by Fine-Tuning on Safeguarded Outputs
Jackson Kaunismaa, John Hughes, Christina Q. Knight, Avery Griffin, Mrinank Sharma, Erik Jones
Abstract
Model developers implement safeguards in frontier models to prevent misuse, for example, by employing classifiers to filter dangerous outputs. In this work, we demonstrate that even robustly safeguarded models can be used to elicit harmful capabilities in open-source models through elicitation attacks. Our elicitation attacks consist of three stages: (i) constructing prompts in adjacent domains to a target harmful task that do not request dangerous information; (ii) obtaining responses to these prompts from safeguarded frontier models; (iii) fine-tuning open-source models on these prompt-output pairs. Since the requested prompts cannot be used to directly cause harm, they are not refused by frontier model safeguards. We evaluate these elicitation attacks within the domain of hazardous chemical synthesis and processing, and demonstrate that our attacks recover approximately 40% of the capability gap between the base open-source model and an unrestricted frontier model. We then show that the efficacy of elicitation attacks scales with the capability of the frontier model and the amount of generated fine-tuning data. Our work demonstrates the challenge of mitigating ecosystem level risks with output-level safeguards.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bba6e77f-3e91-4490-979b-2283a4b59e3cCited by top-tier papers3
- Panacea: Mitigating Harmful Fine-tuning for Large Language Models via Post-fine-tuning PerturbationYibo Wang, Tiansheng Huang, Li Shen, Huanjin Yao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 22 citations
- Antibody: Strengthening Defense Against Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attenuating Harmful Gradient InfluenceQuoc Minh Nguyen, Trung Le, Jing Wu, Anh Tuan Bui et al.ICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- Surgery: Mitigating Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attention SinkGuozhi Liu, Weiwei Lin, Tiansheng Huang, Ruichao Mo et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
Builds on13
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language ModelsXiaogeng Liu, Nan Xu, Muhao Chen, Chaowei XiaoICLR 2024 · 722 citations
- Crosslingual Generalization through Multitask FinetuningNiklas Muennighoff, Thomas Wang, Lintang Sutawika, Adam Roberts et al.ACL 2023 · 319 citations
Related papers
- Jailbreak-Tuning: Models Efficiently Learn Jailbreak SusceptibilityBrendan Murphy, Dillon Bowen, Shahrad Mohammadzadeh, Tom Tseng et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Estimating Worst-Case Frontier Risks of Open-Weight LLMsEric Wallace, Olivia Watkins, Miles Wang, Kai Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 31 citations
- No, of Course I Can! Deeper Fine-Tuning Attacks That Bypass Token-Level Safety MechanismsJoshua Kazdan, Abhay Puri, Rylan Schaeffer, Lisa Yu et al.ICLR 2026
- Fundamental Limitations in Pointwise Defences of LLM Finetuning APIsXander Davies, Eric Winsor, Alexandra Souly, Tomek Korbak et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Stress-Testing Capability Elicitation With Password-Locked ModelsRyan Greenblatt, Fabien Roger, Dmitrii Krasheninnikov, David KruegerNeurIPS 2024 · 47 citations
