Improving Fair Training under Correlation Shifts
Yuji Roh, Kangwook Lee, Steven Euijong Whang, Changho Suh
Abstract
Model fairness is an essential element for Trustworthy AI. While many techniques for model fairness have been proposed, most of them assume that the training and deployment data distributions are identical, which is often not true in practice. In particular, when the bias between labels and sensitive groups changes, the fairness of the trained model is directly influenced and can worsen. We make two contributions for solving this problem. First, we analytically show that existing in-processing fair algorithms have fundamental limits in accuracy and group fairness. We introduce the notion of correlation shifts, which can explicitly capture the change of the above bias. Second, we propose a novel pre-processing step that samples the input data to reduce correlation shifts and thus enables the in-processing approaches to overcome their limitations. We formulate an optimization problem for adjusting the data ratio among labels and sensitive groups to reflect the shifted correlation. A key benefit of our approach lies in decoupling the roles of pre- and in-processing approaches: correlation adjustment via pre-processing and unfairness mitigation on the processed data via in-processing. Experiments show that our framework effectively improves existing in-processing fair algorithms w.r.t. accuracy and fairness, both on synthetic and real datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers8
- "What Data Benefits My Classifier?" Enhancing Model Performance and Interpretability through Influence-Based Data SelectionAnshuman Chhabra, Peizhao Li, Prasant Mohapatra, Hongfu LiuICLR 2024 · 32 citations
- Fairness without Harm: An Influence-Guided Active Sampling ApproachJinlong Pang, Jialu Wang, Zhaowei Zhu, Yuanshun Yao et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 13 citations
- Mind the Graph When Balancing Data for Fairness or RobustnessJessica Schrouff, Alexis Bellot, Amal Rannen-Triki, Alan Malek et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations
- Algorithmic Fairness Generalization under Covariate and Dependence Shifts SimultaneouslyChen Zhao, Kai Jiang, Xintao Wu, Haoliang Wang et al.KDD 2024 · 6 citations
- LEVI: Generalizable Fine-tuning via Layer-wise Ensemble of Different ViewsYuji Roh, Qingyun Liu, Huan Gui, Zhe Yuan et al.ICML 2024 · 5 citations
Builds on13
- Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine LearningFrances Ding, Moritz Hardt, John Miller, Ludwig SchmidtNeurIPS 2021 · 671 citations
- Fair Generative Modeling via Weak SupervisionKristy Choi, Aditya Grover, Trisha Singh, Rui Shu et al.ICML 2020 · 160 citations
- FairBatch: Batch Selection for Model FairnessYuji Roh, Kangwook Lee, Steven Euijong Whang, Changho SuhICLR 2021 · 156 citations
- Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected GroupsSerena Lutong Wang, Wenshuo Guo, Harikrishna Narasimhan, Andrew Cotter et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 134 citations
- Conditional Learning of Fair RepresentationsHan Zhao, Amanda Coston, Tameem Adel, Geoffrey J. GordonICLR 2020 · 127 citations
Related papers
- FRAPPÉ: A Group Fairness Framework for Post-Processing EverythingAlexandru Tifrea, Preethi Lahoti, Ben Packer, Yoni Halpern et al.ICML 2024 · 15 citations
- Fairness and Accuracy under Domain GeneralizationThai-Hoang Pham, Xueru Zhang, Ping ZhangICLR 2023 · 2 citations
- Fairness Is Not Just Ethical: Performance Trade-Off via Data Correlation Tuning to Mitigate Bias in ML SoftwareYing Xiao, Shangwen Wang, Sicen Liu, Dingyuan Xue et al.ICSE 2026
- Fairness Transferability Subject to Bounded Distribution ShiftYatong Chen, Reilly Raab, Jialu Wang, Yang LiuNeurIPS 2022 · 40 citations
- Fairness Guarantees under Demographic ShiftStephen Giguere, Blossom Metevier, Bruno Castro da Silva, Yuriy Brun et al.ICLR 2022 · 57 citations
