Sensing What Surveys Miss: Understanding and Personalizing Proactive LLM Support by User Modeling
Ailin Liu, Yesmine Karoui, Fiona Draxler, Frauke Kreuter, Francesco Chiossi
Abstract
Difficulty spillover and suboptimal help-seeking challenge the sequential, knowledge-intensive nature of digital tasks. In online surveys, tough questions can drain mental energy and hurt performance on later questions, while users often fail to recognize when they need assistance or may satisfy, lacking motivation to seek help. We developed a proactive, adaptive system using electrodermal activity and mouse movement to predict when respondents need support. Personalized classifiers with a rule-based threshold adaptation trigger timely LLM-based clarifications and explanations. In a within-subjects study (N=32), aligned-adaptive timing was compared to misaligned-adaptive and random-adaptive controls. Aligned-adaptive assistance improved response accuracy by 21%, reduced false negative rates from 50.9% to 22.9%, and improved perceived efficiency, dependability, and benevolence. Properly timed interventions prevent cascades of degraded responses, showing that aligning support with cognitive states improves both the outcomes and the user experience. This enables more effective, personalized LLM-assisted support in survey-based research.
• Human-centered computing → Web-based interaction; Ubiquitous and mobile computing systems and tools; Empirical studies in interaction design; Interactive systems and tools.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext baa33e08-c08f-48a3-b311-fabadaef1f73Builds on11
- Understanding the Evolvement of Trust Over Time within Human-AI TeamsWen Duan, Shiwen Zhou, Matthew J. Scalia, Xiaoyun Yin et al.CSCW 2024 · 42 citations
- Assistance or Disruption? Exploring and Evaluating the Design and Trade-offs of Proactive AI Programming SupportKevin Pu, Daniel Lazaro, Ian Arawjo, Haijun Xia et al.CHI 2025 · 31 citations
- Contrastive Explanations That Anticipate Human Misconceptions Can Improve Human Decision-Making SkillsZana Buçinca, Siddharth Swaroop, Amanda E. Paluch, Finale Doshi-Velez et al.CHI 2025 · 31 citations
- ComPeer: A Generative Conversational Agent for Proactive Peer SupportTianjian Liu, Hongzheng Zhao, Yuheng Liu, Xingbo Wang et al.UIST 2024 · 27 citations
- SocialMind: LLM-based Proactive AR Social Assistive System with Human-like Perception for In-situ Live InteractionsBufang Yang, Yunqi Guo, Lilin Xu, Zhenyu Yan et al.UbiComp 2025 · 26 citations
Related papers
- Exploring User Expectations of Proactive AI SystemsChristian Meurisch, Cristina A. Mihale-Wilson, Adrian Hawlitschek, Florian Giger et al.UbiComp 2021 · 66 citations
- ProactiveVA: Proactive Visual Analytics with LLM-Based UI AgentYuheng Zhao, Xueli Shu, Liwen Fan, Lin Gao et al.IEEE VIS 2025 · 4 citations
- Detecting Receptivity for mHealth Interventions in the Natural EnvironmentVarun Mishra, Florian Künzler, Jan-Niklas Kramer, Elgar Fleisch et al.UbiComp 2021 · 83 citations
- ProMemAssist: Exploring Timely Proactive Assistance Through Working Memory Modeling in Multi-Modal Wearable DevicesKevin Pu, Ting Zhang, Naveen Sendhilnathan, Sebastian Freitag et al.UIST 2025 · 9 citations
- Exploring the State-of-Receptivity for mHealth InterventionsFlorian Künzler, Varun Mishra, Jan-Niklas Kramer, David Kotz et al.UbiComp 2020 · 91 citations
