Exploring User Expectations of Proactive AI Systems
Christian Meurisch, Cristina A. Mihale-Wilson, Adrian Hawlitschek, Florian Giger, Florian Müller, Oliver Hinz, Max Mühlhäuser
Abstract
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) enabled digital assistants to evolve towards proactive user support. However, expectations as to when and to what extent assistants should take the initiative are still unclear; discrepancies to the actual system behavior might negatively affect user acceptance. In this paper, we present an in-the-wild study for exploring user expectations of such user-supporting AI systems in terms of different proactivity levels and use cases. We collected 3,168 in-situ responses from 272 participants through a mixed method of automated user tracking and context-triggered surveying. Using a data-driven approach, we gain insights into initial expectations and how they depend on different human factors and contexts. Our insights can help to design AI systems with varying degree of proactivity and preset to meet individual expectations.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get d024b805-cb87-4087-9771-d3f03c0dd666Cited by top-tier papers14
- Satori 悟り: Towards Proactive AR Assistant with Belief-Desire-Intention User ModelingChenyi Li, Guande Wu, Gromit Yeuk-Yin Chan, Dishita G. Turakhia et al.CHI 2025 · 49 citations
- Visual Captions: Augmenting Verbal Communication with On-the-fly VisualsXingyu Bruce Liu, Vladimir Kirilyuk, Xiuxiu Yuan, Alex Olwal et al.CHI 2023 · 45 citations
- Memoro: Using Large Language Models to Realize a Concise Interface for Real-Time Memory AugmentationWazeer Deen Zulfikar, Samantha W. T. Chan, Pattie MaesCHI 2024 · 41 citations
- "AI enhances our performance, I have no doubt this one will do the same": The Placebo effect is robust to negative descriptions of AIAgnes Mercedes Kloft, Robin Welsch, Thomas Kosch, Steeven VillaCHI 2024 · 32 citations
- Assistance or Disruption? Exploring and Evaluating the Design and Trade-offs of Proactive AI Programming SupportKevin Pu, Daniel Lazaro, Ian Arawjo, Haijun Xia et al.CHI 2025 · 31 citations
Related papers
- After Talking with 1,000 Personas: Learning Preference-Aligned Proactive Assistants from Large-Scale Simulated Persona InteractionsZiyi Xuan, Yiwen Wu, Zhaoyang Yan, Vinod Namboodiri et al.UbiComp 2026
- Actions, Speech, and Looks: What Shapes How We Feel About In-Vehicle AI Assistants?Astrid Marieke Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Nikolai Bock, Dimitra Theofanou-Fülbier, Sebastian ZepfCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Understanding User Perceptions of Proactive Smart SpeakersJing Wei, Tilman Dingler, Vassilis KostakosUbiComp 2022 · 33 citations
- Hello There! Is Now a Good Time to Talk?: Opportune Moments for Proactive Interactions with Smart SpeakersNarae Cha, Auk Kim, Cheul Young Park, Soowon Kang et al.UbiComp 2020 · 74 citations
- Need Help? Designing Proactive AI Assistants for ProgrammingValerie Chen, Alan Zhu, Sebastian Zhao, Hussein Mozannar et al.CHI 2025 · 23 citations
