Interactive Proofs For Differentially Private Counting
Ari Biswas, Graham Cormode
Abstract
Differential Privacy (DP) is often presented as a strong privacy-enhancing technology with broad applicability and advocated as a de facto standard for releasing aggregate statistics on sensitive data. However, in many embodiments, DP introduces a new attack surface: a malicious entity entrusted with releasing statistics could manipulate the results and use the randomness of DP as a convenient smokescreen to mask its nefariousness. Since revealing the random noise would obviate the purpose of introducing it, the miscreant may have a perfect alibi. To close this loophole, we introduce the idea of Interactive Proofs For Differential Privacy, which requires the publishing entity to output a zero knowledge proof that convinces an efficient verifier that the output is both DP and reliable. Such a definition might seem unachievable, as a verifier must validate that DP randomness was generated faithfully without learning anything about the randomness itself. We resolve this paradox by carefully mixing private and public randomness to compute verifiable DP counting queries with theoretical guarantees and show that it is also practical for real-world deployment. We also demonstrate that computational assumptions are necessary by showing a separation between information-theoretic DP and computational DP under our definition of verifiability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ba667a5e-f6ad-4eed-8149-83fafc8f1780Cited by top-tier papers6
- Benchmarking Secure Sampling Protocols for Differential PrivacyYucheng Fu, Tianhao WangCCS 2024 · 5 citations
- Certifying Private Probabilistic MechanismsZoë Ruha Bell, Shafi Goldwasser, Michael P. Kim, Jean-Luc WatsonCRYPTO 2024 · 4 citations
- Heli: Heavy-Light Private AggregationRyan Lehmkuhl, Henry Corrigan-Gibbs, Emma Dauterman, David J. WuUSENIX Security 2026 · 1 citation
- Vεrity: Verifiable Local Differential PrivacyJames Bell-Clark, Adrià Gascón, Baiyu Li, Mariana Raykova et al.USENIX Security 2026 · 1 citation
- SoK: Understanding zk-SNARKs: The Gap Between Research and PracticeJunkai Liang, Daqi Hu, Pengfei Wu, Yunbo Yang et al.USENIX Security 2025
Builds on10
- Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and MoreBenedikt Bünz, Jonathan Bootle, Dan Boneh, Andrew Poelstra et al.S&P 2018 · 1,285 citations
- Function Secret Sharing: Improvements and ExtensionsElette Boyle, Niv Gilboa, Yuval IshaiCCS 2016 · 404 citations
- Wolverine: Fast, Scalable, and Communication-Efficient Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Boolean and Arithmetic CircuitsChenkai Weng, Kang Yang, Jonathan Katz, Xiao WangS&P 2021 · 205 citations
- Lightweight Techniques for Private Heavy HittersDan Boneh, Elette Boyle, Henry Corrigan-Gibbs, Niv Gilboa et al.S&P 2021 · 134 citations
- Manipulation Attacks in Local Differential PrivacyAlbert Cheu, Adam D. Smith, Jonathan R. UllmanS&P 2021 · 122 citations
Related papers
- Towards Separating Computational and Statistical Differential PrivacyBadih Ghazi, Rahul Ilango, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar et al.FOCS 2023 · 3 citations
- Deciding Differential Privacy for Programs with Finite Inputs and OutputsGilles Barthe, Rohit Chadha, Vishal Jagannath, A. Prasad Sistla et al.LICS 2020 · 24 citations
- GPM: The Gaussian Pancake Mechanism for Planting Undetectable Backdoors in Differential PrivacyHaochen Sun, Xi HeSIGMOD 2026
- Private Counting from Anonymous Messages: Near-Optimal Accuracy with Vanishing Communication OverheadBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Rasmus PaghICML 2020 · 59 citations
- The Discrete Gaussian for Differential PrivacyClément L. Canonne, Gautam Kamath, Thomas SteinkeNeurIPS 2020 · 355 citations
