Mostly Text, Smart Visuals: Asymmetric Text-Visual Pruning for Large Vision-Language Models
Sijie Li, Biao Qian, Jungong Han
Abstract
Network pruning is an effective technique for enabling lightweight Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), which primarily incorporates both weights and activations into the importance metric. However, existing efforts typically process calibration data from different modalities in a unified manner, overlooking modality-specific behaviors. This raises a critical challenge: how to address the divergent behaviors of textual and visual tokens for accurate pruning of LVLMs. To this end, we systematically investigate the sensitivity of visual and textual tokens to the pruning operation by decoupling their corresponding weights, revealing that: (i) the textual pathway should be calibrated via text tokens, since it exhibits higher sensitivity than the visual pathway; (ii) the visual pathway exhibits high redundancy, permitting even 50% sparsity. Motivated by these insights, we propose a simple yet effective Asymmetric Text-Visual Weight Pruning method for LVLMs, dubbed ATV-Pruning, which establishes the importance metric for accurate weight pruning by selecting the informative tokens from both textual and visual pathways. Specifically, ATV-Pruning integrates two primary innovations: first, a calibration pool is adaptively constructed by drawing on all textual tokens and a subset of visual tokens; second, we devise a layer-adaptive selection strategy to yield important visual tokens. Finally, extensive experiments across standard multimodal benchmarks verify the superiority of our ATV-Pruning over state-of-the-art methods. Code is available at https://github.com/LezJ/ATV-Pruning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b9dd24fe-4a00-4eac-b3fc-b4c3eb1a14a6Builds on14
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot LearningJean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 6,707 citations
- Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question AnsweringPan Lu, Swaroop Mishra, Tanglin Xia, Liang Qiu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,727 citations
- PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language ModelDanny Driess, Fei Xia, Mehdi S. M. Sajjadi, Corey Lynch et al.ICML 2023 · 2,601 citations
- SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can be Accurately Pruned in One-ShotElias Frantar, Dan AlistarhICML 2023 · 1,240 citations
Related papers
- ATP-LLaVA: Adaptive Token Pruning for Large Vision Language ModelsXubing Ye, Yukang Gan, Yixiao Ge, Xiao-Ping Zhang et al.CVPR 2025
- Reducing Token Redundancy in LVLMs: A Systematic Review of Token Pruning MethodsHanzhang Yuan, Mengxuan Hu, Wenhao Zhang, Tianlong Wang et al.ACL 2026
- One Layer's Trash is Another Layer's Treasure: Adaptive Layer-wise Visual Token Selection in LVLMsYongru Chen, Kai Zhang, Zeliang Zong, Yuchen Lu et al.CVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- DCP: Dual-Cue Pruning for Efficient Large Vision-Language ModelsLei Jiang, Zixun Zhang, Yuting Zeng, Chunzhao Xie et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- HAWK: Head Importance-Aware Visual Token Pruning in Multimodal ModelsQihui Zhu, Tao Zhang, Yuchen Wang, Shuangwu Chen et al.CVPR 2026 · 4 citations
