HAWK: Head Importance-Aware Visual Token Pruning in Multimodal Models
Qihui Zhu, Tao Zhang, Yuchen Wang, Shuangwu Chen, Xiaobin Tan, Jian Yang, Yang Liu, Yinfei Pan
Abstract
In multimodal large language models (MLLMs), the surge of visual tokens significantly increases the inference time and computational overhead, making them impractical for real-time or resource-constrained applications. Visual token pruning is a promising strategy for reducing the cost of MLLM inference by removing redundant visual tokens. Existing research usually assumes that all attention heads contribute equally to the visual interpretation. However, our study reveals that different heads may capture distinct visual semantics and inherently play distinct roles in visual processing. In light of this observation, we propose HAWK, a head importance-aware visual token pruning method that perceives the varying importance of attention heads in visual tasks to maximize the retention of crucial tokens. By leveraging head importance weights and text-guided attention to assess visual token significance, HAWK effectively retains task-relevant visual tokens while removing redundant ones. The proposed HAWK is entirely training-free and can be seamlessly applied to various MLLMs. Extensive experiments on multiple mainstream vision-language benchmarks demonstrate that HAWK achieves state-of-the-art accuracy. When applied to Qwen2.5-VL, HAWK retains 96.0% of the original accuracy after pruning 80.2% of the visual tokens. Additionally, it reduces end-to-end latency to 74.4% of the original and further decreases GPU memory usage across the tested models. The code is available at https://github.com/peppery77/HAWK.git.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c58aaf05-a7dc-42f0-99f9-21e2e3c6bd5cBuilds on15
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question AnsweringPan Lu, Swaroop Mishra, Tanglin Xia, Liang Qiu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,727 citations
- Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language ModelsYifan Li, Yifan Du, Kun Zhou, Jinpeng Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 344 citations
- WorldSense: Evaluating Real-world Omnimodal Understanding for Multimodal LLMsJack Hong, Shilin Yan, Jiayin Cai, Xiaolong Jiang et al.ICLR 2026 · 162 citations
- Beyond Attention or Similarity: Maximizing Conditional Diversity for Token Pruning in MLLMsQizhe Zhang, Mengzhen Liu, Lichen Li, Ming Lu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 104 citations
Related papers
- Hi-Lo Prune: Look at What You'll Lose before Pruning with Hierarchical Token SelectionZixun Sun, Yubo Dong, Hehe Fan, Yi YangCVPR 2026
- Beyond Text-Visual Attention: Exploiting Visual Cues for Effective Token Pruning in VLMsQizhe Zhang, Aosong Cheng, Ming Lu, Renrui Zhang et al.ICCV 2025 · 8 citations
- VLM-Pruner: Buffering for Spatial Sparsity in an Efficient VLM Centrifugal Token Pruning ParadigmZhenkai Wu, Xiaowen Ma, Zhenliang Ni, Dengming Zhang et al.CVPR 2026 · 6 citations
- Don't Just Chase "Highlighted Tokens" in MLLMs: Revisiting Visual Holistic Context RetentionXin Zou, Di Lu, Yizhou Wang, Yibo Yan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 49 citations
- VFLowOpt: A Token Pruning Framework for LMMs with Visual Information Flow-Guided OptimizationSihan Yang, Runsen Xu, Chenhang Cui, Tai Wang et al.ICCV 2025 · 1 citation
